Recent Comments:
NTSC Grand Theft Auto IV leaks online {Xbox 360 Fanboy}
Apr 24th 2008 7:16PM Give me a break, dude. For a 40 hour game & countless hours of multiplayer, $60 is very reasonable if you compare it to any other form of entertainment.
NTSC Grand Theft Auto IV leaks online {Xbox 360 Fanboy}
Apr 24th 2008 7:11PM I gotta say, if I had a modded 360, I'd be downloading this too. I already purchased the game and have to wait until it arrives now.
'GTA IV: Meant to Be Played on the PS3' says amazon.com [Update] {PS3 Fanboy}
Apr 22nd 2008 9:25PM It IS meant to be played on PS3, and also it is meant to be played on Xbox 360... What systems did you think it was coming out for?
Grand Theft Auto NES {Nintendo Wii Fanboy}
Apr 20th 2008 11:38PM The dragon boss was pretty funny though.
Rumor: GTA IV DLC may include entirely new cities {Joystiq}
Apr 20th 2008 12:14PM A lot of people don't realize that the 3d GTA games are actually pretty small size compared to most other games even those the game world is some much bigger. GTA 3 and GTA Vice are both only about 1 gig - 1.5 gigs including audio, and GTA San Andreas is about 4.5 gigs, with 3.5 dedicated completely to audio. So based on that, it think the expansion pack could be pretty small. It all depends on all the new audio, and that can be always be compressed to make the file size smaller. Given that the data will already be on the disc, I bet they could release a whole new small city plus missions and new compressed audio for 500mb or maybe even less if they wanted to.
Monster Cable tries to harass Blue Jeans Cable, fails {Engadget HD}
Apr 16th 2008 5:46PM or you could just buy a $2 3ft hdmi cable on ebay and get the same exact picture quality... The choice is yours.
Monster Cable tries to harass Blue Jeans Cable, fails {Engadget HD}
Apr 16th 2008 5:43PM Lowest Rated? LOL!
I'm sorry for not liking to be ripped off. Exc~use me.
Monster Cable tries to harass Blue Jeans Cable, fails {Engadget HD}
Apr 16th 2008 12:59AM Okay, your cheapest is $3.89. that's good. But what makes your BJC Series-1 $21.50 so much more better, when you are going to get the same EXACT picture quality...? No need to answer that.
I'll admit that I never tried your cables, but I've heard they are high quality. I would try your analog cables, but for digital I just go generic because it's all the same quality for short runs. I just don't appreciate multiple skus when there is no REAL difference, to me that's an asshole move, but don't take it personal.
Monster Cable tries to harass Blue Jeans Cable, fails {Engadget HD}
Apr 16th 2008 12:45AM I'm not talking about their analog type cables. I'm only talking about HDMI cables, and Blue Jeans sells it for too much. Yes, cheaper than Monster, but like I said, even the cheapest HDMI cables get you the same quality picture as most expensive. And Blue Jeans has a bunch of different HDMI cable skus(which is Monster type bullshit), as if it really matters. Buying an 6 feet HDMI cable on ebay for $4, is going to get you the same picture quality picture as Blue Jeans' $30 6 foot HDMI cable.
On the Asshole scale, Monster is at the top, and Blue Jeans is not even close to Monster, but they are BOTH still on the Asshole scale in my opinion based on HDMI cables alone.
Monster Cable tries to harass Blue Jeans Cable, fails {Engadget HD}
Apr 14th 2008 10:27PM Ahh, both companies are a bunch of assholes. They both try to sell HDMI cables for way too much. And everyone knows that even some of the shittiest quality HDMI cables will get you the same quality digital picture as the most expensive.
