Netgear MoCA Coax-Ethernet adapter review
Although we were just kids when all the world's computers connected to each other via a coax cable, we still recognize the throughput potential of the medium. This and the fact that just about every home in America already has coax running through its walls has always made us wonder why we couldn't utilize those wires to connect our computers. If you've wondered the same thing, then MoCA might just be for you. It is a CableLabe specification that allows devices to utilize the unused bandwidth on the coax at your house to send bits where no other medium can. So if you're sick of trying to stream HD via Wifi and power-line technologies, you're going to really want to click through and read about how these babies work.
The concept
This is a new device so we think a little introduction is in order. While this little box looks like a switch it's really a bridge, in fact it is a Ethernet to coax bridge. You need two devices to get started, but can use up to 16. Each one has two coax connections and one Ethernet. The coax acts as a pass through so you can continue to use the coax cable for its initial purpose -- you know cable TV or an ATSC antenna (not compatible with satellite). With these you can add a network connection anywhere in your house you have a coax cable running.

The best example
Lets say you have one of those new LG Blu-ray players that can stream HD MKV files from your PC, but you don't have a network connection behind your HDTV. You've tried 802.11N WiFi and power-line adapters, but they just don't cut it. So you grab a pair of these and plug one in to the coax running to your cable modem in your office, and you put the other one behind your TV in-line with the cable running to your TV. Plug the one in the office into your switch and the one behind the TV into your Blu-ray player -- sadly it only has one port so your Xbox 360 and PS3 can't play without an additional switch -- and now you have 100Mbps of throughput, which is more than enough to stream any HD movie you've got with bandwidth to spare.

The real word
According to Netgear the MCAB1001 can move 270Mbps across the existing coax in your house while at the same time not interfering with your cable TV. We would've loved to have tested this out ourselves, but the Ethernet ports on them are only 100Mbps. The good news is that in most cases we were able to get the full 100Mbps through a pair of these, but not in every case. The exception is when there are splitters in the middle. Most houses have simple three of four way splitters near the source, but we were able to find someone with a 16 port splitter, and things didn't go as well. The good news is that we were still able to move 30Mbps across the wire, which is more than enough to stream HD.

Setup couldn't be simpler
Using the MCAB1001 as a bridge couldn't be simpler. You plug them in and they just work. There are lights on the front that make it easy to tell if the devices can find each other. As far as your network is concerned they are completely transparent. The bad part of this is that when you do want to break away from the defaults, things aren't nearly as simple. There is a switch on the back that puts the devices into configuration mode, but in addition you have to have special software install on your Windows computer -- no Mac or Linux options. The configuration is pretty limited since things pretty much work out of the box, but you can enable security (in case your neighbors have some of these) and over ride the channel the device uses if it's causing interference.

Conclusion
If all of this sounds great, then you know there has to be a catch. Well the catch is the price and at $200 per pair, you're probably going to want to try some cheaper alternatives first. The good news is that unlike the alternatives this does work as advertised, and considering this is a first generation product we expect the prices to come down. So if $200 sounds like a deal to get a network connection fast enough to stream high quality HD anywhere in your house where you have coax, then we'd say; go for it. You won't be disappointed.
The concept
This is a new device so we think a little introduction is in order. While this little box looks like a switch it's really a bridge, in fact it is a Ethernet to coax bridge. You need two devices to get started, but can use up to 16. Each one has two coax connections and one Ethernet. The coax acts as a pass through so you can continue to use the coax cable for its initial purpose -- you know cable TV or an ATSC antenna (not compatible with satellite). With these you can add a network connection anywhere in your house you have a coax cable running.

The best example
Lets say you have one of those new LG Blu-ray players that can stream HD MKV files from your PC, but you don't have a network connection behind your HDTV. You've tried 802.11N WiFi and power-line adapters, but they just don't cut it. So you grab a pair of these and plug one in to the coax running to your cable modem in your office, and you put the other one behind your TV in-line with the cable running to your TV. Plug the one in the office into your switch and the one behind the TV into your Blu-ray player -- sadly it only has one port so your Xbox 360 and PS3 can't play without an additional switch -- and now you have 100Mbps of throughput, which is more than enough to stream any HD movie you've got with bandwidth to spare.

The real word
According to Netgear the MCAB1001 can move 270Mbps across the existing coax in your house while at the same time not interfering with your cable TV. We would've loved to have tested this out ourselves, but the Ethernet ports on them are only 100Mbps. The good news is that in most cases we were able to get the full 100Mbps through a pair of these, but not in every case. The exception is when there are splitters in the middle. Most houses have simple three of four way splitters near the source, but we were able to find someone with a 16 port splitter, and things didn't go as well. The good news is that we were still able to move 30Mbps across the wire, which is more than enough to stream HD.

Setup couldn't be simpler
Using the MCAB1001 as a bridge couldn't be simpler. You plug them in and they just work. There are lights on the front that make it easy to tell if the devices can find each other. As far as your network is concerned they are completely transparent. The bad part of this is that when you do want to break away from the defaults, things aren't nearly as simple. There is a switch on the back that puts the devices into configuration mode, but in addition you have to have special software install on your Windows computer -- no Mac or Linux options. The configuration is pretty limited since things pretty much work out of the box, but you can enable security (in case your neighbors have some of these) and over ride the channel the device uses if it's causing interference.

Conclusion
If all of this sounds great, then you know there has to be a catch. Well the catch is the price and at $200 per pair, you're probably going to want to try some cheaper alternatives first. The good news is that unlike the alternatives this does work as advertised, and considering this is a first generation product we expect the prices to come down. So if $200 sounds like a deal to get a network connection fast enough to stream high quality HD anywhere in your house where you have coax, then we'd say; go for it. You won't be disappointed.






















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Ethan @ Jun 25th 2009 3:35PM
I have four of these in my house currently. They are great because I can't run Ethernet (I currently rent my home) and the PowerLine adapters have never worked well for me. I've got about 10 splits on my line but the speed is fantastic anyway. I have had zero problems with them.
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED. I got them from NewEgg.
John Newhouse @ Jun 25th 2009 7:39PM
Ethan,
can you explain how you're using all 4? if you have 2 devices in separate rooms that you want to connect. you'd need 2 pairs, right?
Next to your cable modem is the first adapter which is paired with an adapter in a second room to a device. i understand this.
For the second device though, i have to add *another* adapter next to the cable modem and first adapter which is paired with an adapter in a third room to a second device. is this right? i really want to get this, but it seems like a lot of clutter next to my cable modem...
Joshua @ Jun 25th 2009 9:18PM
@John: They're not paired. The one at your DSL or cable modem can talk to all the others in your house.
Ethan @ Jun 26th 2009 7:38PM
Correct... i have one next to my cable modem. The other three are in different rooms in the house. You can have as many of these as you want. They aren't "paired" together in any way. The clutter is minimal.
solidunit @ Jun 25th 2009 4:03PM
cant you just ebay a pair of motorola nim100's off of ebay for a lot cheaper and get the same result? Thats what i've been using to stream HD for more than a year now
nsfw @ Jun 25th 2009 4:19PM
the moto 100's allow you to sorta bridge your existing cable tv and internet with ethernet? i can't find a picture of the moto 100's to see what ports are available.
rdevilbi @ Jun 25th 2009 4:20PM
I just checked eBay and the Min100's appear to be priced about the same after shipping...
That Guy @ Jun 26th 2009 10:31AM
I picked up a set of three NIM100's on ebay for roughly $100 shipped.
If you have FIOS, or already have a MoCA router of some sort, the NIM100's are the best thing since sliced bread. The good news is that the Actiontec routers don't require a NIM100 at that end of the connection, so you can use all 3 in the other rooms. Throw in a few cheap gigabit switches, and you're golden.
As a result, I've been streaming 1080p content everywhere in my house for the last year without ANY glitching or lag... good stuff! :)
Richard @ Jun 25th 2009 4:55PM
NIM100s rock if you can get them cheap. I have three, and they work perfectly doing what this Netgear does. MOCA appears to be the best of the non-Ethernet in-home systems, at least in my experience. I got my NIM100s for under $30 each, and feel they were my best tech purchase of 2008. One of them (with a Netgear $10 switch) feeds high speed data to my BD deck, HD-DVD deck, TiVo, and X360. Glad to see the MoCA technology taking off.
I wonder if these Netgear boxes are interoperable with the NIM100, I'm guessing they should be. Would be nice in case I have to add rooms.
acme @ Jun 25th 2009 5:01PM
Can i use this to replace my shitty actiontec router?
Jeremy W @ Jun 25th 2009 6:17PM
No.
MoCA_Guy @ Jul 6th 2009 8:20PM
Actually, you could. You will need to connect your preferred router to the MCA1001 with an Ethernet cable and connect the MCA1001 to your ONT on the wall with a Coax cable.
dan @ Jun 25th 2009 5:18PM
wow, i think someone took all those dusty picture comments to heart....
Prop Joe @ Jun 25th 2009 5:26PM
Can you connect this to the uplink of a switch or hub to get more ports?
Jeremy W @ Jun 25th 2009 6:18PM
Absolutely.
hedgewizard @ Jun 25th 2009 7:05PM
I pre-ordered mine a ways back, and received my units shortly before they came-off pre-order on the Netgear site. They worked incredibly well for the first week or so. But at some point the units began running into various issues communicating between the pair.
I've been in touch with Netgear support for over 2 months now on this topic with no resolution. On my first case with them, one of the support engineers suggested I had faulty units and they would contact me to replace them. That ticket was closed without resolution. So I opened up a second one. This one has been open since May 29th with the following notice:
"Based on the complexity of this case, it may be appropriate for me to seek additional resources. I recommend escalating your case to the next level for further review and response. We will get back to you at the earliest. "
Still haven't heard back from anyone on this .
Based on the initial use, these are great, but if you have a problem with your units - Netgear support is less than ideal...
Francis @ Jun 25th 2009 7:16PM
That's pretty neat! But I'm using Comcast cable for my Internet and digital cable. Will this interfere with that?
Joshua @ Jun 25th 2009 9:20PM
They don't interfere with cable. Satellite uses different frequencies and is a no-go.
Joseph @ Jun 25th 2009 7:36PM
Question. (dwight from office. Anyone?)
I buy a pair of these, but want ethernet over coax in three rooms not just one. Do they sell individual switches/bridge?
Pradeep @ Jun 25th 2009 7:48PM
Thanks for the review Ben. Looks like I at least have one reliable solution that will definitely work (though expensive). No solution (that I have considered) so far is inexpensive. Easiest would be to go the route of Wireless N, but I have heard about range problems with Wireless N routers and not all of my devices support Wireless N. So, I might have to upgrade the equipment or get some kind of a bridge etc. Also, I am not sure if Xbox 360 supports it. If I look at Powerline devices, they do not seem to be cheap either, especially when I consider that I have to have them in at least 3 rooms or more. Also, not sure if that will work or not.
me @ Jun 25th 2009 8:19PM
I wonder if these play nice with Directv on your coax.
Ethan @ Jun 26th 2009 7:40PM
No, they won't, sorry. No satellite service will work with these.
Ben @ Jun 25th 2009 8:29PM
I hate to say it, but it's days like this when I wonder why I even bother. I mean did anyone RTFP? Just about every question posed in the comments was covered in the review. I mean the entire post is only like 700 words, is that really too much to read?
Blake @ Jun 25th 2009 8:42PM
I was thinking the exact same thing as I was reading these questions...RTFP...
Mike F. @ Jun 25th 2009 8:44PM
Nice review Ben and nice hardwood floors!
ohpleaseno @ Jun 25th 2009 9:06PM
As one of those who were busting your balls about the dust, let me just say that your floor looks fantastic. We expect a review of the new Swiffer mop soon.
Raghu @ Jun 25th 2009 9:17PM
Can you expand on the default setting of no security? i.e. after I have a pair of these, if my neighbor (he might be hooked into same splitter as my cable lines in our apt complex) plug one in, will he be in my network?
Chris @ Jun 25th 2009 10:06PM
I read every word and it doesn't make any sense to me, call me stupid but I don't really care. My house is wired with Coax but not Ethernet. My cable modem is in my basement. I've always wanted to play Xbox Live in my bedroom but can't because the Wifi connection sucks. Is this a solution to this problem?
I've also always wanted to have Digital Cable on my bedroom TV without having to pay for another comcast hd box. Does this solve this problem by stealing the signal between my HD Box and my TV and broadcasting it to the other unit placed in my bedroom?
Most people I know are looking to solve these two problems, not run a fucking ethernet port to their blu ray player to get streaming media from their fucking pc. Talk about a niche product, so niche they'll sell a grand total of 12 because it takes at least 3 pairs per person to get any worth out of them...
Ben @ Jun 25th 2009 10:07PM
Yes this will help you get network connectivity to your 360 where you wifi doesn't reach.
No, you'll still need some sort of box to get digital cable on your bedroom TV.
James @ Jun 26th 2009 8:07AM
I want to warn users on following items:
1. Their data-sheet shows up to 270 Mbps and then in the small fonts in the bottom it says "Actual data throughput will vary. Network conditions and environmental factors, including volume of network traffic, building material and construction, and
network overhead, lower actual data throughput rate."
2. Then you read that this product can't even support 50 Mbps in a real life use case and 270 Mbps is actually a phy-rate.
3. It does not and will never work with Satellite service (Dish or DirectTV). Because that's the fundamental constraints with MoCA technology.
Can't Netgear go with any other stronger technologies like UWB or HPNA?
Ben @ Jun 26th 2009 8:28AM
We easily saw 100Mbps of throughput via two regular splitters. The only time we saw it dip down below 50Mbps is when we tested with a 16 way splitter. That is hardly a normal application since if you have 16 TVs in your house, you probably don't need this as you have cat5 too.
Michael Lerner @ Jun 26th 2009 8:48AM
I can confirm Engadget's review. In a typical home with 4-6 outlets, you are almost guaranteed to get 100 mbps throughput. The 270 is the *total* capacity. HPNA and wireless perform so much poorer, if you can wire with MoCA it's well worth the extra cost.
Jay @ Jun 26th 2009 8:15AM
I have a FIOS modem/router that already supports MOCA for the watch anywhere feature on the DVR/digital boxes. Could I just get one of these and use it with my existing setup, or do they have to be the same on both ends?
Does this make sense, or am I totally off base all together?
michael.lerner @ Jun 26th 2009 8:50AM
Yes Jay, the MoCA standard is backwards and forward compatible. You may not exactly see the same performance since the Netgear is 1.1 and your FIOS router is probably 1.0 but they are full interoperable.
That Guy @ Jun 26th 2009 11:05AM
With the FIOS Actiontec routers, you're better off getting the Motorola NIM100's available on ebay for much cheaper. You won't even need to connect one at the router. Just place them in-line on the COAX behind every TV, and you're golden!
I "wired" three rooms this way for just under $100, and 1080p HD content streams perfectly!
funkmeisterJ @ Jun 26th 2009 9:31AM
I've been using these MOCA units in my home and they've been working so well I forget they are even there. We use them to connect the living room and bedrooms to the router in my home/office and routinely stream HD MKVs and Netflix around the house to different TVs. The MOCA is indistiguishable from having a CAT-5 wired network which is why we got them in the first place, after dithering around with a bunch of powerline and wireless bridges for months trying to make them work. I HIGHLY RECOMMEND them to anyone who wants the speed and reliability of a wired network at home, but doesn't have CAT-5 already in the house.
James @ Jun 26th 2009 12:41PM
Thanks Ben, but you are talking about a test case. Here is my real life scenario. I have some streams that are about 20-22 Mbps (I won't share with you where I got those from :)). And with my four room configuration where one node is my Sony laptop as a source, this product just couldn't support my needs.
I love Netgear products but this one sucks for sure :)
Michael: I see "MoCA" sticker on the box and I checked what MoCA is supporting currently. I am a end user and I don't care for the numbers that are not going to be useful in a practical case. Here, 270 is a phy-rate and not the actual throughput.
I have to agree with you, Wireless sucks but I don't see MoCA is solving my problem either.
funkmeisterJ @ Jun 27th 2009 2:54PM
Like I mentioned in my post, I'm streaming some big video files (20-30Mbps) and the MOCA has been flawless, even with multiple videos going at the same times. This is not in the lab, but my 1600 sq ft home. I gotta agree that the label-ing on these networking products are overhyped; I found varying speeds for Homeplug av (200Mbps on box, 50-70Mbps txrx) and MOCA (270Mbps / 140+ txrx). Like I said, I'm very happy with these MOCA units.
Regarding Satellite, both Directv and Echostar are listed on the MOCA alliance members website so their probably not there just to support cable-only technology.
cathib @ Jun 26th 2009 1:48PM
I have a set of these and could use a little assistance. First set that came, read every board I could find. First unit connected to router worked after setup with the software but all the lights that the instructions said should be lit were not - but it worked great.
Second unit in living room - no lights no nothing. The Cust Svc woman from God only knows what country took about an hour for me to understand she was giving me an RMA. Amazon sent replacement before I even sent back the defective unit.
Second set - first unit set up as above working properly. Second unit in living room - discovered Brighthouse has installed a powered amp inline with the coax. Tried bypassing amp - no tv picture. This is telling me the signal is already weak so how is it going to give me internet speeds too? The powered amp is not bi-directional so Moca won't work.
What to do? Should I set up in another room to be sure I have a good and working unit? After that what? How can I get this to work in Living Room where home theater is with the powered amp? Is there such a thing as a bi-directional powered amp and how the heck much is one of those and where to get? sigh - is this even worth it? House only 5 freaking years old and Brighthouse REFUSES to come put in ethernet drops even if I agree to a charge. They don't want to amplify my ethernet speed obviously...
Could there be bad splitter in attic or at incoming box to house? Thanks in advance for assistance!
foxb @ Jun 26th 2009 3:13PM
It will not work over powered amps. What you could do is connect your living room united before the powered amp.
Ethan @ Jun 26th 2009 7:43PM
I have a powered amp with over 10 splits in my line. I have a large house at 3700 sqr feet and these work perfect. I DID have to change the frequency on the devices to get rid of interference with my TV, but after I did that they work perfect.
I have Comcast VoIP, Internet, and HDTV services.
MoCA_Guy @ Jul 6th 2009 7:44PM
Q) What to do? Should I set up in another room to be sure I have a good and working unit? After that what? How can I get this to work in Living Room where home theater is with the powered amp? Is there such a thing as a bi-directional powered amp and how the heck much is one of those and where to get?
A) There are two ways. You can either bypass your current power amp with two splitters, or you can replace your current power amp with a bi-directional power amp.
You can find the bi-directional power amp at your local Radio Shack for $50:
http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2103093
James @ Jun 27th 2009 6:30PM
funkmeisterJ, I am happy that it works for you. As you already read above from many users, how inconsistent is this product.
It is sad that it is not even giving me 66Mbps. I wonder where did my 200 Mbps go..HAHA!!
FYI. I have already returned my units. No no to MoCA for me. It is a frustrating experience.
HuskerDude @ Jun 29th 2009 12:17PM
Nice hardwood floors
xnappo @ Jul 1st 2009 3:39PM
See my post on AVSForum if you want MoCA but not for $200:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1145636