<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Engadget HD Podcast 117 - 01.09.2009: CES Edition</title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2009/01/09/engadget-hd-podcast-117-01-09-2009-ces-edition/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Engadget HD Podcast 117 - 01.09.2009: CES Edition</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Podcast 117 - 01.09.2009: CES Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2009/01/09/engadget-hd-podcast-117-01-09-2009-ces-edition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2009/01/09/engadget-hd-podcast-117-01-09-2009-ces-edition/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why all the Palm Pre coverage?  A bit overkill.  I know its exciting and all but its getting a bit much.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2009 3:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Podcast 117 - 01.09.2009: CES Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2009/01/09/engadget-hd-podcast-117-01-09-2009-ces-edition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2009/01/09/engadget-hd-podcast-117-01-09-2009-ces-edition/</guid><description><![CDATA[The first mp3 link is directing to the wrong mp3.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[IMBigWillie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2009 6:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Podcast 117 - 01.09.2009: CES Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2009/01/09/engadget-hd-podcast-117-01-09-2009-ces-edition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2009/01/09/engadget-hd-podcast-117-01-09-2009-ces-edition/</guid><description><![CDATA[Gentlemen,<br><br>Any word on DLP HDTVs?  Are they officially dead yet?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy Incognito]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2009 8:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Engadget HD Podcast 117 - 01.09.2009: CES Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2009/01/09/engadget-hd-podcast-117-01-09-2009-ces-edition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2009/01/09/engadget-hd-podcast-117-01-09-2009-ces-edition/</guid><description><![CDATA[OK, this is the part I don't get about this whole "connected" TV thing, including connected Blu-Rays, etc.  Do that many people really have ethernet running into their living room?  I suppose that most people with a house have their modem in an office or room other than their main TV viewing area, like a den or family room.  I don't ever see people's computers in the same room as their TV's unless they are living in an apartment or a dorm.   People with houses would have to run ethernet from one room to another and I never knew this was something folks did in great enough numbers to make all of this "connectedness" viable. (that "in great enough numbers* being the operative point here).<br><br>This seems even more odd since most people who have networks in their house have wireless networks.  Are they running both a wireless router AND running ethernet around their house?  What am I missing?<br><br>What is frustrating, of course, is that I have I have cable internet, so all that internet goodness is right there in the cable going into the TV system, so all it would take is a modem there to have instant connection, rather than hooking up through a network (wireless or ethernet) from a router in another room.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vance]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 14th 2009 1:27PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>