Skip to Content
x264 works great for me, there is no need to pay for some proprietary knock off.
x264? oh you mean that container that develops the rarely supported MKV container? I swear that container lives and dies on one machine!
Supports M4V and M2TS as well, which are actually useful, unlike MKV, and the converters have gotten a little better to mux between the two. For a while MKV was a real dead end.
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
David Hildreth @ Dec 23rd 2008 12:12PM
x264 works great for me, there is no need to pay for some proprietary knock off.
Dominic @ Dec 23rd 2008 12:45PM
x264? oh you mean that container that develops the rarely supported MKV container? I swear that container lives and dies on one machine!
J.Goodwin @ Dec 23rd 2008 1:21PM
Supports M4V and M2TS as well, which are actually useful, unlike MKV, and the converters have gotten a little better to mux between the two. For a while MKV was a real dead end.