How many people reading engadget use only OTA signals on analog-only TVs? 3 maybe? The switchover is irrelevant if you have cable/satelite or an HDTV of. Who here doesn't have either?
It's prefectly reasonable that he wouldn't have cable/sat running into his garage. Especially if he's got satellite, and didn't want to add another STB to a TV that probably doesn't get taht much use.
I have OTA only, and I read EngadgetHD every day. I get my high def broadcasts through a DirecTV box with an ATSC tuner hooked up to my computer monitor. I get 720p broadcasts on a 24" monitor, and all it costs is the $50 I spent on the receiver.
HD content doesn't have to cost sixty bucks a month.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Le Big Mac @ Dec 17th 2008 1:01PM
How many people reading engadget use only OTA signals on analog-only TVs? 3 maybe? The switchover is irrelevant if you have cable/satelite or an HDTV of. Who here doesn't have either?
TJ @ Dec 17th 2008 1:10PM
It's prefectly reasonable that he wouldn't have cable/sat running into his garage. Especially if he's got satellite, and didn't want to add another STB to a TV that probably doesn't get taht much use.
kevin @ Dec 17th 2008 7:01PM
I have OTA only, and I read EngadgetHD every day. I get my high def broadcasts through a DirecTV box with an ATSC tuner hooked up to my computer monitor. I get 720p broadcasts on a 24" monitor, and all it costs is the $50 I spent on the receiver.
HD content doesn't have to cost sixty bucks a month.