DrXym - I'd prefer they just standardize online downloads. Profile 2.1 could be the high level parts of HD DVD incorporated into Blu-ray (Advanced Content, etc.) It'd be an easy upgrade, and you'd get managed copy and a standardized download and standardized streaming system for free. BD-J with half a dozen third rate digital streaming standards is about the worst way of doing it, and does nothing to help create a flexible system that ultimately will allow digital purchases as well as digital rentals or subscriptions.
JBDragon - yep. It isn't easy to sell Blu-ray players at the moment. BD is a backwards format that's designed, essentially, for a world unchanged since the 1980s. It assumes people will want to visit stores to buy physical objects that represent the movies they want to watch.
But it's not the 1980s, or the 1990s, it's the 21st Century. Physical media is dying, and consumers are excited about systems that allow them to use their internet connections to watch libraries of content. HD is obviously a good thing, but it's not a compelling thing. What has proven to be compelling over the last thirty years has been increased convenience and features and anyone who produces a technology that offers slightly better quality but virtually no added convenience is not producing anything likely to be successful.
Behind it all, I think most Blu-ray manufacturers understand this. But they're screwed because the industry backed the wrong horse, so they're trying to make the best of it by incorporating the numerous proprietary streaming and download systems into their players, selling the players not as BD players but as generic "Better than DVD movie players".
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
squiggleslash @ Dec 1st 2008 11:01AM
DrXym - I'd prefer they just standardize online downloads. Profile 2.1 could be the high level parts of HD DVD incorporated into Blu-ray (Advanced Content, etc.) It'd be an easy upgrade, and you'd get managed copy and a standardized download and standardized streaming system for free. BD-J with half a dozen third rate digital streaming standards is about the worst way of doing it, and does nothing to help create a flexible system that ultimately will allow digital purchases as well as digital rentals or subscriptions.
JBDragon - yep. It isn't easy to sell Blu-ray players at the moment. BD is a backwards format that's designed, essentially, for a world unchanged since the 1980s. It assumes people will want to visit stores to buy physical objects that represent the movies they want to watch.
But it's not the 1980s, or the 1990s, it's the 21st Century. Physical media is dying, and consumers are excited about systems that allow them to use their internet connections to watch libraries of content. HD is obviously a good thing, but it's not a compelling thing. What has proven to be compelling over the last thirty years has been increased convenience and features and anyone who produces a technology that offers slightly better quality but virtually no added convenience is not producing anything likely to be successful.
Behind it all, I think most Blu-ray manufacturers understand this. But they're screwed because the industry backed the wrong horse, so they're trying to make the best of it by incorporating the numerous proprietary streaming and download systems into their players, selling the players not as BD players but as generic "Better than DVD movie players".
Hence we have the situation thus far.