<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for The Dark Knight Blu-ray Disc review roundup</title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for The Dark Knight Blu-ray Disc review roundup</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Dark Knight Blu-ray Disc review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[One thing that is a shame is that it only has roughly CD quality audio at 16-bit and not 24-bit, but High-Def Digest still give it 5-stars for audio! <br><br>I can't wait for this!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dj496]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 28th 2008 4:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Dark Knight Blu-ray Disc review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would counter that if it sounds "Five Star" good, then who cares whether it's 16 or 24 bit?<br><br>Not to mention, some BD players (including my Sharp) can't decode Dolby TrueHD at 24 bit...weird and frustrating.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TrentD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 28th 2008 4:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Dark Knight Blu-ray Disc review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Also reports of edge enhancement that results in visible edge halos.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 28th 2008 5:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Dark Knight Blu-ray Disc review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[16 bit 44.1 khz?<br><br>What happened to the promise of amazing audio thanks to Blu-ray's capacity? <br><br>@ TrentD<br><br>If your BD player is too old & low spec to play everything properly then that's your fault, <br>the BDA don't give a f**k, "you knew what you were getting into" apparantly.<br>.... or at least you ought to have.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Multi-format-mayhem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 29th 2008 12:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Dark Knight Blu-ray Disc review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Warnered!<br><br><a href="http://bit.ly/13wmy" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/13wmy</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 28th 2008 6:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Dark Knight Blu-ray Disc review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Of course 16 bit audio matters. This is just one of the biggest box office smashes ever. What in the hell are they thinking? 16 bit 44.1 khz is bearly CD quality sound. And whatever happened to bit for bit identical sound to the studio masters? one of the features they use to market Bluray. There should be a minimum 24 bit/ 96KHZ requirement for audio quality. This is more important than the damn AACS encryption, BD+ DRM crap that's a mandatory requirement on every disc.<br><br> Just goes to show the big movie companies don't care about quality. I hope the movie industry doesn't need a buyout next.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 28th 2008 6:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Dark Knight Blu-ray Disc review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[> 16 bit 44.1 khz is bearly CD quality sound.<br><br>Er, that's exactly the specs for compact discs, and always has been!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob78]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 28th 2008 10:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Dark Knight Blu-ray Disc review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[In.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DaveG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 28th 2008 9:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Dark Knight Blu-ray Disc review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[As a sound guy on this film, I don't understand why WB didn't give them the 24-bit/48 kHz masters.  Batman Begins also had a 24-bit master but yet WB decided to release the downscaled 16-bit version for the HD-DVD/Blu-Ray.  <br><br>And for LB saying that there should be a minimum requirement for "96 kHz" in audio quality for Blu-ray, most American films are shot with 24-bit/48 kHz wave files with the post-production done in the same bit depth and sampling rate.  <br><br>Older films (i.e. before digital location sound mixing) can be done even higher than 24/48.  The recent BR release of Baraka as a DTS-MA 24/96 track as well as the Tai Seng release of Peter Chan's Perhaps Love.  The upcoming BR release of Katsuhiro Otomo's Akira will also be coming out with a 24/96 track next year.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sound Designer Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 28th 2008 10:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Dark Knight Blu-ray Disc review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Warner has released 2 films to date with 24 bit sound.. Blade Runner (The Final Cut, TrueHD) and Flags of Our Fathers (AU/EU Import, PCM). TDK is not special.. Sony is just as bad, but no one rags on them.  Nearly everything they release is also 16bit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike P]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 29th 2008 10:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Dark Knight Blu-ray Disc review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA["Sony is just as bad, but no one rags on them. Nearly everything they release is also 16bit." - Mike P<br><br>What?  Sony has been releasing most of their latest titles with 24-bit PCM/Dolby TrueHD/DTS-MA sound.  <br><br>Here's a few titles:<br>Hancock<br>Close Encounters of the Third Kind<br>30 Days of Night<br>Dogma<br>Drillbit Taylor<br>The Fall<br>Gattaca<br>Immortal Beloved<br>Made of Honor<br>Monty's Python's Life of Brian<br>Paprika<br>The Professionals<br>Resident Evil Trilogy<br>Run Lola Run<br>Spider Man 2<br>Spider Man 3<br>Surf's Up<br>We Own the Night<br>Youth Without Youth<br><br>The reason why Dark Knight is special is because it was shot, mixed, and mastered at 24-bit and WB gives us 16-bit downconverts for the "lossless" soundtrack.  They might as well just give us only the lossy Dolby Digital track.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sound Designer Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 29th 2008 6:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Dark Knight Blu-ray Disc review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[oh dear god there's SO much retardedness in this thread...<br><br>human ears can only resolve around 11-13 bits of your 16/24 bits of audio you're demanding. please go to hydrogenaudio or avsforum to prove otherwise.<br><br>Sound Designer Dan: has this been a recent change? multiple sources on AVSForum claim that most films are mixed (or at least final mixdown) at 16bit (however last i bothered to take note of discussions like this was 6-12 months ago). i know for a fact that presentation outside of 100% digital projection are 16/44.1 (DTS APT-X100).<br><br>i'm surprised people aren't complaining more about the EE. it's pretty ugly in lossless screenshots. i personally won't make a judgement until i can watch an untouched copy of it (which may have to wait until xmas). my only complaint is that there's no "theatrical presentation" in case the AR changes are too noticeable due to everyone's smaller-than-IMAX screens.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[plonk420]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 29th 2008 7:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Dark Knight Blu-ray Disc review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey plonk420,<br><br>As I know, it's only recently (post-2006) that most studio films are mixed down at 24-bit/48 kHz.  Pre-2006, only the biggest studio blockbusters (i.e. Spider Man 2, Pirates of the Caribbean 1) were mixed down at 24/48.<br><br>Don't listen to those guys at AVSForum, they don't know what they're talking about.  What I'm really angry about is that our workflow (location sound/ADR/SFX/stems/mixdown/mastering) on the Dark Knight was completely 24/48 and yet WB decided to use 16/48 downconverted "masters" for the TrueHD track of the film.  I'm also disappointed with those Blu-ray shots with EE because the DI of the film looked absolutely jaw-dropping.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sound Designer Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 29th 2008 8:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Dark Knight Blu-ray Disc review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/11/28/the-dark-knight-blu-ray-disc-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[what percentage of people (home theater end users) can actually tell the difference between 16 and 24 bit as a final playback format? even the AES say it's it's nearly impossible if not impossible to do so.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[plonk420]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 29th 2008 11:05PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>