ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review

Gallery: ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review
The Goods
The ZVOX 425 is the internet company's pick of the litter, and it looks (and at 25 pounds, weighs) the part. The metal grille fronts a trio of 3.25-inch drivers in the center, a couple more 3.25-inch drivers pushed out to the edges of the front baffle (more on these later) and a 4-inch subwoofer driver placed at each end-cap. There's a 133-Watt amplifier onboard to put all these cones in motion, and those drivers at the far left and right are used in conjunction with the PhaseCue circuitry to enhance the surround-sound experience. The $700 price tag on this single cabinet may seem heavy, but you'll notice right away that this piece of gear is solid and dense -- no plastic or hot glue-gun feel to the construction here -- and ZVOX back this favorable first impression up with specs that reach down to 35Hz. As you can see from the photos, the 425 isn't exactly petite, not quite fitting underneath our 42-inch display.

The ZVOX 550 is the company's newest offering, and it's an interesting solution to a common problem of how to locate the soundbar+TV combo. The 550 is a broad, short box that makes it easy for you to put the TV (up to about 50-inches are within spec) right on top of the speaker itself. This little bit of design might seem obvious, but we were pretty taken with how downright practical it is. Again, a metal grille is up front, and the cabinet houses five 2-inch drivers, a single 5.25-inch downward-firing woofer that is ported out the back and a 60-Watt amp. All told, the 550 is specced for 45Hz - 20kHz response. And of course, included with the $500 admission price, you get ZVOX's PhaseCue circuitry to spread the soundstage as well.

Both units are controlled with a small remote that controls standby, volume, mute, bass, treble and PhaseCue.
Setup
Bundled in with the 425 is a right-angled IEC power cord and a RCA patch cord, also right-angled. There's a good reason for the L-shaped connectors -- the 425's ports are mounted on a recessed section of the unit's bottom side. This makes for a nice tidy install, but the RCA jack clearance isn't exactly roomy, and only angled plugs will allow the 425 to sit flat on surface. Even cheap, generic RCA patch cords didn't fit properly. It's a small niggle, and probably of absolutely zero consequence to the intended audience, but we have to make a note of it. The 425 also has a knob for S.A.N.E. (sudden audio noise eliminator) -- basically a compressor circuit, which we left in the off position for the review.

The 550 does without the recessed panel, employing a more standard arrangement of RCA stereo inputs on the rear panel along with a plug for the transformer's umbilical cord. The 550 also goes without the S.A.N.E. circuitry.
Both the 425 and 550 have two RCA stereo inputs. There are no digital inputs or digital decoding. Given the constraints of a soundbar, we can understand the design choice to limit input to stereo -- what's the point of decoding every surround-sound codec when the output is tied to a single chassis? We'd much rather the engineers choose to focus on making the most enjoyable experience out of a universal sound format (in this case, stereo) rather than decode a variety of formats only to hamstring them to a soundbar.
Sound
First things first -- the stereo-only hookups are a big hint to you that neither of these soundbars are meant to compete with a 5.1-speaker system when it comes to wrapping you in a soundfield. Producing discrete channel-like sound effects is something better left to soundbars that take a "sound beam" sort of approach (which in our experience really only work well in rectangular rooms) like the Yamaha soundbars. Both ZVOX products here are aimed at producing sound that's way beyond what you'll get from speakers built into your display's cabinet, while still being svelte enough to work into a streamlined system. And on those counts, both the 425 and 550 models succeed.
In our experience, the PhaseCue circuitry definitely helped widen the soundstage without making the speakers sound too "phasey," as if the left and right channels were completely out of phase. It's a nice effect, and definitely helps the sound "separate" from the cabinet. The tradeoff is that the adjustment had a definite effect on the overall tonality of the soundbars that (not surprisingly) interacted with the treble balance. Since we generally preferred a little less PhaseCue adjustment when listening to music, and a little more while listening to soundtracks, we also had to adjust the treble up and down a little between the two types of content as well; the remote definitely comes in handy.
Let's start with the 425, which is ZVOX's full-range offering. It's a pretty hefty unit, and it has sound to match. If we had to characterize the 425's sound in one word, it'd be "bold." The bass response of the 425 is surprising, as are the sound levels that it can reach. As impressive as the low-end reach is, though, we found the speaker a little tilted towards the "dark" side -- upper registers come through clearly, but never quite sparkle. Bear in mind that we just had the Paradigm Phantoms in for audition, which have a highly detailed treble that leans in the other direction, so the contrast in sound character was especially apparent and may not be as noticeable without the back-to-back comparison.
Moving on to the 550 offered a really interesting contrast. We came away feeling like the 550 tries to do a little less, and is more successful as a result. The bass response is nowhere near as extended, but we found the overall character of the 550 more neutral than its bigger brother. Add this in to the sheer practicality of the cabinet design and the lower price point, and we think the 550 is a real winner.
Some other lessons really sunk in during our time with the ZVOX soundbars. As we said, soundbars are by nature compromised in terms of generating true surround-sound. But we really like the approach ZVOX has taken here in not compromising on sound quality. Music was very enjoyable on both units, and soundtracks were clear when watching movies. These products are all about generating high quality sound from a single cabinet, and they do so without sounding overprocessed (especially off-axis) like we've heard in some soundbars that are laden with more bells and whistles. Good, clean sound in a small, simple package -- sounds like a perfect setup for the den or bedroom, doesn't it?
Conclusion
"So these two guys named ZVOX come into the soundbar, and..." Seriously, these products are no joke, and based on the number of entrants in the soundbar field, the CE manufacturers agree. The simplicity of a soundbar to match svelte displays is a trend that isn't likely to go away. Even if your installation requires that you give up on discrete multichannel surround-sound, you don't have to give up on sound quality. These products are a great fit for space is limited and/or install simplicity is needed. For customers who are turned off by speakers built into TVs (which are too-often just dreck), but unwilling to string up speakers and a receiver, these soundbars are a great solution. We imagine a lot of people have a TV somewhere in the home that matches that description -- maybe it's not the main TV in the living room, but secondary viewing areas fit the bill quite nicely.
The 425 is, no doubt, the more powerful of the two products. If you need to fill a larger space or need more bass, it's the one for you. We wouldn't call $700 cheap for a soundbar, but you do get a lot of speaker (and amplifier) for the money. Remember that ZVOX is an internet-only company, so a lot of retailer margin savings are passed on to you, and it shows -- even with the 425 pumping out good volumes, there were no rattles or squeaks, just good clean sound.
For our money, the 550 fits perfectly into the soundbar niche; it not only fits easily into a flat panel display installation, it can actually be part of the installation. Its leaner tonal balance overall provides sound quality miles beyond anything we've heard from speakers built into a TV, and with a little PhaseCue added in, most folks probably won't realize the slim black TV pedestal is pumping out the sound.
In the end, the ZVOX 425 and 550 aren't for every install; but where high quality sound has to be balanced with simplicity and streamlining, they're a perfect match. If you've got a second system somwehere that's using the TV's built-in speakers, you'll be pleasantly surprised by the difference an upgrade to high-quality sound from one of these units can make.






















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
palehorse @ Nov 18th 2008 2:42PM
My question is how these might compare to similarly priced HTIB's from Sony and Onkyo... will the cheap 5.1 always win out, or do these actually sound better than cheap HTIB's, even without the extra speakers?
Inquiring minds want to know...
Steven Kim @ Nov 18th 2008 3:30PM
Good question -- I haven't had one of the Onkyo/Sony HTIB systems in my setup, so this is based on in-store vs. in-home comparison, but I'd say that the overall quality is similar, with perhaps a slight edge for the ZVOX sound quality (tonal balance, compression, etc.). The nod goes to the discrete HTIB systems for creating a true surround-soundfield. Overall convenience would go for the soundbar, though.
TJ @ Nov 18th 2008 4:16PM
So what's the price on the 550?
Steven Kim @ Nov 18th 2008 4:20PM
The ZVOX 550 goes for $500.
Johnny Neat @ Nov 18th 2008 4:32PM
I want to know how these would even match up against Onkyo's HT-S9100THX 7.1 that goes for $799.00? Or how about Yamaha's sound bar offerings, which from what I remember were highly rated by cnet?
Anyone know?
Joe Seph @ Nov 18th 2008 11:18PM
I fail to see the consumer appeal of this product that appears to be many years behind in technology. This is evident in the lack of digital inputs, Dolby Digital or DTS encoders.
ZVOX must not have performed a market survey prior to the initial concept phase of this product launch. Doing so would have provided them with a clear view of what features have been implemented and adopted buy consumers with product offerings from Yamaha and even Sony with their HT-CT100 and RHT-S10 that offer HDMI switching, Dolby Digital and DTS Encoders, and even accept up 7.1 PCM decoded audio via Blu-ray players.
ZVOX Tom @ Nov 19th 2008 1:50PM
Hi – this is a reply from Tom, at ZVOX. Thanks for your comments.
We use an analog, phase-manipulation design (we call it PhaseCue) for virtual surround sound because we prefer it to the digital alternatives. It provides a wide, deep, three-dimensional sound field without sacrificing musical accuracy or vocal clarity. In our experience, creating virtual surround in the digital domain almost always generates some less-than-natural results – for example, rain that sounds like white noise or female vocalists that take on a twangy sound.
We also find our customers prefer using the analog output of a TV because in many cases it allows them to use the TV remote to control the volume of the ZVOX. And we find that there is no audible difference between using an analog input vs. a digital input.
As for switching, we’ve found that most people would much rather use their TV to do switching, rather than using the sound system. It’s simpler, more intuitive and requires the use of fewer remote controls. And we’d rather spend dollars on quality speaker drivers and wood cabinets than on switching systems most people won’t use.
micknkeif @ Nov 19th 2008 1:16AM
I'm really enjoying your write ups Steve. I know this is an HD site but keep the audio reviews coming!
Steven Kim @ Nov 19th 2008 11:58AM
Thanks -- I've got some more stuff lined up, so stay tuned!
Mitch @ Nov 23rd 2008 2:31PM
How does the ZVOX 415 fare in all of this? I understand it's one of the models they're
offering a discount on during this Holiday season.
ZVOX Tom @ Dec 2nd 2008 6:08PM
The ZVOX 415 uses the same amplifier and virtual surround system (we call it PhaseCue) as the Z-Base 550 -- but in a 30.5"w x 5.5"h x 5"d soundbar-style design (you can wall-mount it or put it on a shelf beneath your TV). It uses three 3.25" main speaker drivers (versus the five 2" drivers in the 550), and a 4" woofer with a 4" passive radiator (versus the 5.25" woofer in the 550). Because the cabinet is smaller than the 550's (838 cubic inches vs. 1116 cubic inches) the 415's bass has less punch than the 550. In most other ways the sound is pretty comparable.
CD Hill @ Nov 24th 2008 11:46AM
In 2007, we purchased our first LCD-HDTV; a 20-inch Sharp AQUOS for use in the kitchen. Great picture, disappointing sound; so I discovered and bought a ZVOX Mini. It rocks! Not only is the sound quality excellent at all volumes, but the best part is that it requires zero effort or skill to use. I actually had to prepare a cheat sheet for family use of our larger, older system: a DVD player, TV and stereo system that required several steps to play a DVD with surround sound. The ZVOX turns itself on-off with the TV and we use the TV remote to adjust the sound level. It is well made and a joy to use. I had one tech support query (turned out to be a bad battery in the remote that we don't use anyway; but ZVOX replied promptly and offered to replace the remote if there was a problem). I have become a real fan because ZVOX obviously has put a lot of thought and effort into designing and making a simple, high quality product that sounds great, and they stand behind it. We are now looking at adding some large 40-52 inch HDTV's and I plan to buy additional ZVOX 425/550 units because of the convenience and excellent experience with the Mini. So I want to see ZVOX hang around for a long time! I have looked at HTIB offerings and think most of them look and sound pretty cheap. The ZVOX line is unobtrusive, so you don't have the visual clutter. Unless you like the intrusive look of speakers everywhere or are in the movie business or have a REAL home threater setup with a big investment in speakers and audio equipment, you are like most people who want to turn on the TV and watch a movie/sporting event with very good sound. They have a 30-day trial, so you really can't lose by trying them, and I think you will be pleasantly surprised at what you hear. I was awed.
inteller @ Dec 4th 2008 10:40AM
man, the industrial design looks a WHOLE lot like the YSP-800/900 Yamahas. Is Zvox a cheapo Yamaha brand...kinda like Aiwa was for Sony?
ZVOX Tom @ Dec 5th 2008 4:24PM
Hi, this is Tom, from ZVOX. We aren't associated with Yamaha in any way. And while our systems are typically less expensive than Yamaha's, we use MDF cabinets, high-quality speaker drivers and amplifiers. What we don't spend money on is a wide variety of digital inputs, switching systems, Dolby decoders, and displays -- because most people have a good TV that will provide all those.
Perfecto @ Dec 12th 2008 1:07PM
Great review and equally interesting comments. Since I'm in the market for a quality, (more or less) affordable product such as this, I am curious about connectivity when you have a TV monitor (ie, no tuner or speakers), a satellite receiver and a dvd player. Will these ZVOX products allow you to easily connect all 3 components or will it be necessary to eliminate 1 of them? Also, can the 550 handle the weight of a 50 inch, 130 lb PDP? Thanks
Steven Kim @ Dec 12th 2008 1:11PM
The 550 has two inputs, so your DVD and sat receiver can both be hooked up at the same time. The ZVOX website says the 550 can support up to 90 pounds, so your 50-inch plasma might be a little heavy, though. I'd contact them directly and see if you can stretch to 130 pounds safely.
RonS @ Dec 15th 2008 1:24PM
I, like a lot of people want the Home Theater experience without adding a lot of hardware and wiring. I started looking into soundbar's and the more I looked, the more confused I got. No HDMI's on this model, no video switching on that model, not enough audio inputs on any model, ETC, ETC. I am interested in the ZVOX 425 because of all of the very good reviews I have read so far. (More so than any other manufacturer). I want to be able to watch movies and experience the surround sound experience. I am not a great movie buff or music connosueir. Will your product deliver the sound I am hoping for in a 12' x 24' room, ( I realize that this is not a true 5.1 surround system). I also want to piggyback off of Perfecto's question. I have a DVD player and a DVR with a 5 connector cable hooked up to my HDTV. Will I be able to hook up my components to your unit.
Steven Kim @ Dec 16th 2008 12:00PM
RonS:
The room I tested the 425 in is about the same size as yours, maybe a little bigger since it opens into the kitchen -- I think it will fill your room with sound, provided you're not after ear-splitting levels. It has two inputs, so you will be able to feed it stereo from both your DVR and DVD player. As for wanting "the surround sound experience," you'll get a good stereo image that sounds like it's floating out in your room. It's not as "surround-y" as discrete multichannel speakers (that require wire and boxes), but it's better than what you'll get out of your TV alone. You'll have to decide for yourself if the soundstage presented by the 425 (or any soundbar) fits your needs.
Gary Gerson @ Dec 30th 2008 1:05AM
I am seriously considering the 550 as I believe it is the perfect product for my application. Here's the situation, I just bought a brand new home back in March and it came with a beautiful double mantle configuration in the living room that was built specifically to hold a 42" flat screen TV. I had a matching shelf built to go inside it and house the Direct TV DVR and Blue Ray DVD player, plus I left enough room so that there are 3&1/2" from the top of the TV to the top of the double mantle opening. I didn't do it for a reason, it just worked out that way.
I don't have room for a surround sound receiver component and I don't want to spend a lot of money paying someone to run wires behind the sheet-rock, not even sure they can without a lot of work.
So I am looking for something that will be an upgrade in TV sound to help fill up the room, doesn't have a receiver or separate bass module, and will fit in the 3&1/2" I've got left. Not really concerned about surround sound...I am building a media room in the basement and will blow it out down there. Just looking for a sound upgrade that works in my configuration and really delivers quality sound.
Based on what I have read, the 550 sounds like just what I am looking for!
I think ZVOX should market the 550 for the above the mantle or double mantle configurations. Every house in my subdivision has a double mantle of some sort, either just a recessed spot for a TV or a true double mantle like mine, and all of them could probably use this device to boost the sound quality.
William Davis @ Jan 10th 2009 1:12PM
Can you control the volume with the remote of a Samsung LN40A550 LCD TV with the Zvox 550?
Dale Allen @ Feb 12th 2009 5:22PM
I was looking online for surround systems to compliment the new DLP we purchased for our home. Neither my wife nor I wanted a system with a bunch of wiring to string all over the room and when I saw the ZVOX unit on the website that fit underneath the T.V. we decided to give it a try. I may add a sub woofer just because I like a little more bass than the unit produces but the virtual surround sound is incredible. The cabinet is very nice and adds to the "look" of our T.V. I actually built a couple of black box supports for the ends of my T.V. since the units specs did not recommend placing a T.V. the size we purchased on top of the Z-Base 550 without additional support. I turn the T.V. sound back on occasionally just to revel in the difference.The only thing I haven't figured out yet is how to get my universal remote to work the Z-Vox unit but it is no big issue for sure. Worth the money!