"Please, NO! First they ruined the original AT&T Wireless..."
This is not true. The current at&t (formerly SBC Communications) was not the same "AT&T" of AT&T Wireless - that was the old company (& old management).
When AT&T Wireless was going south, at that time SBC was the principal owner of Cingular Wireless (a competitor), and only later acquired assets of the old AT&T when it went under -- including the name, which they kept (it's over 100 years old you know), but changed the logo from all caps to lower caps: at&t
Again, the new (& current) at&t didn't have anything to do with the management and business practices of the older "AT&T Wireless", an asset that was originally McCaw Cellular, started by Craig McCaw (the "father" of the modern cell phone business, and very wealthy). Here's his Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_McCaw
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Joseph @ Nov 1st 2008 11:07PM
"Please, NO! First they ruined the original AT&T Wireless..."
This is not true. The current at&t (formerly SBC Communications) was not the same "AT&T" of AT&T Wireless - that was the old company (& old management).
When AT&T Wireless was going south, at that time SBC was the principal owner of Cingular Wireless (a competitor), and only later acquired assets of the old AT&T when it went under -- including the name, which they kept (it's over 100 years old you know), but changed the logo from all caps to lower caps: at&t
Again, the new (& current) at&t didn't have anything to do with the management and business practices of the older "AT&T Wireless", an asset that was originally McCaw Cellular, started by Craig McCaw (the "father" of the modern cell phone business, and very wealthy). Here's his Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_McCaw