THANK YOU. I'm glad someone finally called a spade a spade and said that 120 Hz is a bad thing.
It could have been great for eliminating judder, but instead these companies interpolate frames and make it a big runny, uber-smooth mess. Film isn't made to look silky-smooth.
I literally almost get sick watching 120 Hz displays. I saw Sony's new 240 Hz displays at CEDIA, and they're even worse. It's creating data that wasn't there, and it ruins the experience.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
TrentD @ Oct 30th 2008 3:18PM
THANK YOU. I'm glad someone finally called a spade a spade and said that 120 Hz is a bad thing.
It could have been great for eliminating judder, but instead these companies interpolate frames and make it a big runny, uber-smooth mess. Film isn't made to look silky-smooth.
I literally almost get sick watching 120 Hz displays. I saw Sony's new 240 Hz displays at CEDIA, and they're even worse. It's creating data that wasn't there, and it ruins the experience.