http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/ Engadget HD Comments for Royal Digital Media trots out 100GB-per-disc Blu-ray competitor http://www.engadgethd.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadgethd.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/
Um what? More info please]]>Oct 29th 2008 1:17PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/
"DreamStream's security capabilities are achieved through the use of their proprietary, 30-round, 2,048-bit European Encryption Solution (EES). More information on DreamStream can be found at http://www.dreamstream.info. "

It's statements like that which tell you they're selling snake oil. Bruce Schneier would tear these folks to pieces.]]>Oct 29th 2008 1:21PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/
I wonder what the % is of people out there that even have TV's capable of Higher Definition(1920p)?]]>Oct 29th 2008 1:21PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/
I think today, it's not so much about player price anymore as it is about the price of the content and this new technology will restart the adoption cycle one more time and if Blu-Ray has it hard to catch on mainstream due to other ways of getting content, this technology won't have a chance starting in 2009.]]>Oct 29th 2008 1:27PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/
"RDM's players are backwards compatible and able to read traditional CDs and DVDs. Moreover, an innovation in data processing enables RDM's players to "drastically enhance the playback quality of regular DVD content," said Diebel."

That must be some innovation...sounds sort of like upscaling to me.]]>Oct 29th 2008 1:43PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/Oct 29th 2008 1:47PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/
I wonder if Royal Digital Media (if that is your real name!) will wait until it wastes a billion dollars or 750 million - whatever - before it goes belly up - hmm I would like to be at that meeting and see that sales pitch:

" with Toshiba leaving the market - there is plenty of room for us to enter with having an initial expenditure of 2 billion - yes - we think 2 billion will ensure survival!" LOL ]]>Oct 29th 2008 2:44PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/Oct 29th 2008 3:35PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/
Anyword on the movie studioson this?

Are new movies shot in 1920p are would iron man need to be worked on?]]>Oct 29th 2008 3:48PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/Oct 29th 2008 4:05PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/Oct 30th 2008 6:00AMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/
]]>Oct 29th 2008 6:54PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/Oct 29th 2008 9:24PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/Oct 31st 2008 8:53PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/http://www.electronista.com/articles/08/10/06/sanyo.12x.blu.ray.laser/ or http://www.physorg.com/news9683.html)

Also Sony does not own Blu-ray, it is ran by the BDA (http://www.blu-ray.com/info/)

Un-crackable..... HAHAHAHA everyone famous last words.]]>Nov 3rd 2008 12:12PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/10/29/royal-digital-media-trots-out-100gb-per-disc-blu-ray-competitor/Nov 3rd 2008 5:21PM