Samsung's LED-backlit LN46A950 LCD HDTV gets reviewed
[Thanks, Nate]
[Thanks, Nate]
Relevant Posts
- Samsung's 55-inch LN55A950 LCD HDTV reviewed: exceptional and expensive (7 days ago - 5 Comments)
- Panasonic's FreeSat-tuning TX-37LZD81 HDTV reviewed (Yesterday - 0 Comments)
- JVC's DVR-packin' LT-26DE9BJ LCD HDTV gets reviewed (4 days ago - 0 Comments)
- Sony's BRAVIA KDL-26M4000/R LCD HDTV reviewed (7 days ago - 2 Comments)
- Sony's 52-inch BRAVIA KDL-52XBR6 gets reviewed (56 days ago - 11 Comments)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Aaron Smith @ Sep 15th 2008 5:35PM
Yeah, but if it breaks then you have to call Samsung...for that reason alone I'd stick with Panasonic plasma. Panny will at least send you one while yours is getting fixed.
steelwurm @ Sep 15th 2008 10:25PM
Looking forward to seeing how this stacks up against the Sony XBR8s.
Ken @ Sep 16th 2008 12:18AM
Note the prices went up:
46A950 $3,199 -> $3,499
55A950 $4,499 -> $4,999
We had them at work at the lower prices for about a week, and then they popped up.
Also want to say in real life, the blooming is MUCH more annoying that the review plays it off to be, I would almost say (for me personally) it ruins the TV.
Woody @ Sep 16th 2008 9:31AM
Man these LED backlit LCD's are awesome. I'm still going to end up buying the 52" 750 series due to cost, but the 950 series is just incredible.
MooseMuffin @ Sep 16th 2008 10:21AM
I think the tech is still a year or two off. They need to up the number of backlight zones to combat the blooming and bring the price down a little. Hopefully the LED tech trickles down to more of the LCD product line too.
Loban @ Sep 16th 2008 4:36PM
For that price, why wouldn't you just buy a Plasma?
David Susilo @ Sep 16th 2008 7:43PM
hmmm... a Pioneer Kuro is still cheaper than these things. So why bother?
Electronics Review @ Oct 5th 2008 8:43PM
Crazy pricing...wait 6-12 months and save about 50%.
http://www.youreviewelectronics.com/samsung-hdtv-reviews/