Skip to Content
But maybe, just maybe it will cause TWC to push up those terrible upload speeds. Come on!384Kbps upload is appalling. 512Kbps is not even worth the upgrade to their Turbo charged tier.
Don't see how it would affect much. We already have AT&T DSL all over the area. Embarq is more likely to push TWC speeds. Embarq is the only one that has faster plans than AT&T. But I agree, the downstream isn't too bad, but the upstream does suck.
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
k @ Aug 22nd 2008 8:43AM
But maybe, just maybe it will cause TWC to push up those terrible upload speeds. Come on!
384Kbps upload is appalling. 512Kbps is not even worth the upgrade to their Turbo charged tier.
Andrew @ Aug 22nd 2008 12:42PM
Don't see how it would affect much. We already have AT&T DSL all over the area. Embarq is more likely to push TWC speeds. Embarq is the only one that has faster plans than AT&T. But I agree, the downstream isn't too bad, but the upstream does suck.