<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Hollywood can already control what you record on your DVR</title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/hollywood-can-already-control-what-you-record-on-your-dvr/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Hollywood can already control what you record on your DVR</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hollywood can already control what you record on your DVR]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/hollywood-can-already-control-what-you-record-on-your-dvr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/hollywood-can-already-control-what-you-record-on-your-dvr/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think it will happen just not within the next two years. Analog component is an outdated technology already. It sucks but that is the facts. They could be petitioning to turn the component off (never happen) but they are just wanting to downgrade it. I see it happening over the next 3 to 5 years.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pluckyhd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2008 5:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hollywood can already control what you record on your DVR]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/hollywood-can-already-control-what-you-record-on-your-dvr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/hollywood-can-already-control-what-you-record-on-your-dvr/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does this mean that the Hauppauge HD DVR may suddenly stop recording non OTA HD channels?  <br>That is bull___!  Someone finally comes up with a useful home product, and Hollywood's bullying already.<br>I'd like to see a desktop dvr like the above Hauppauge unit, that does not need a computer--Hollywood is killing the marketplace for custom dvrs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[horngreen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2008 7:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hollywood can already control what you record on your DVR]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/hollywood-can-already-control-what-you-record-on-your-dvr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/hollywood-can-already-control-what-you-record-on-your-dvr/</guid><description><![CDATA[So what you are trying to tell me is, I didn't have to go out and buy that new HDTV with HDMI imputs and that my old one with component inputs would have been just fine. Great, technologly is a love/hate relationship. I hate all of these stupid HDCP, SOC, ICT and so ons. . . Oh well you it wasn't a total loss, I cleaned up a bunch of cable clutter at least.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2008 1:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hollywood can already control what you record on your DVR]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/hollywood-can-already-control-what-you-record-on-your-dvr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/hollywood-can-already-control-what-you-record-on-your-dvr/</guid><description><![CDATA[The only problem with the FC petitions is for every one well-worded comment that actually showed cause and clear intent on the benefits of component over HDMI and that lifting the ban would endanger consumers fair-use you get 100,000: "DUDEZ, DNT' DO ITTT!@!@!@!!!!! ZOMG THEY R EVIL!!!! AnD TEH SUXXORS. WE HEART CMPNENT CABLZES."<br><br>That right there dilutes the efficacy of the good comments. The whole point is, that, no company or 3rd party shall dictate or control what we do in our own homes unless it causes harm or limits the rights of others.<br><br>As piracy is a real concern, they should refrain from taking retaliatory action and remove the reasons for piracy. Trying to limit our rights even more for sheer profitability will just beget piracy.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MadMike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2008 1:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hollywood can already control what you record on your DVR]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/hollywood-can-already-control-what-you-record-on-your-dvr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/hollywood-can-already-control-what-you-record-on-your-dvr/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pretty sure my last update for Vista corrected this flag issue.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter F]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2008 4:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hollywood can already control what you record on your DVR]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/hollywood-can-already-control-what-you-record-on-your-dvr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/hollywood-can-already-control-what-you-record-on-your-dvr/</guid><description><![CDATA[Copyright is a limited government-enforced monopoly given to encourage creation of works for the public to enjoy.  It would only take a vote of Congress to cut copyright terms in half, or limit its effect, or put conditions on it again.  Copyright was 26 years in living memory, now it's 95 years (retroactive).  It can go the other way.<br><br>It would take a groundswell of resentment directed at copyright holders to get Congress to act, but they do seem to be intent on offending every last customer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kcmurphy88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2008 11:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hollywood can already control what you record on your DVR]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/hollywood-can-already-control-what-you-record-on-your-dvr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/hollywood-can-already-control-what-you-record-on-your-dvr/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, what you wrote above may be true, but it's incomplete.  Yes, MPAA wants to use SOC to turn off your analog outputs, but remember this is "Selectable Output Control," not "Selectable Analog Output Control."  MPAA isn't just asking the FCC for the ability to limit content out analog outs, it's asking the FCC for the right to be able to choose which output it's movies can use.<br><br>Meaning, MPAA could develop it's own special output plug, and only allow it's content to flow out from that plug.  Sony is a member of the MPAA, and one of the studios that asked for SOC.  Sony is also the company that developed a special proprietary port on the back of their Bravia TVs that their online distribution uses--Hancock is reportedly going to be released early, but only thru this special port on Bravia TVs.<br><br>Coming up with a new plug in itself isn't a bad thing, but be assured that manufacturers who want to use that port will have to cripple the functionality of their device.  I suggest to you that *that* is what MPAA is really after, not just turning off analog outs.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2008 9:48AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>