<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for AT&amp;T splitting 2 HD / 2 SD and 1 HD / 3 SD into separate service levels?</title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for AT&amp;T splitting 2 HD / 2 SD and 1 HD / 3 SD into separate service levels?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T splitting 2 HD / 2 SD and 1 HD / 3 SD into separate service levels?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</guid><description><![CDATA[Of course, they want you to pay extra for that shiny new HDTV. Wonder why the HDTV sales are stagnant?  Blu-Ray costs too much, HDTV service costs too much and regular SD looks like crap on a HDTV.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MadMike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2008 11:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T splitting 2 HD / 2 SD and 1 HD / 3 SD into separate service levels?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</guid><description><![CDATA[Articles like this really expose U-verse for the joke that it is... all I can say is, thank God I'm in a FiOS area...  maybe if their customers started defecting in droves AT&T would wake up and realize that FTTH is the only way to go in 2008...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2008 11:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T splitting 2 HD / 2 SD and 1 HD / 3 SD into separate service levels?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmmm...  I'm 22,000 miles away and I get 6 HD channels at a time into 3 boxes.  U-verse is obsolete junk.  Even cable is better.  I guess they continue because none of the SBC, oops, AT&T suits want to take the write-off on their watch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kcmurphy88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2008 11:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T splitting 2 HD / 2 SD and 1 HD / 3 SD into separate service levels?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cable here is not better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Spiza]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2008 12:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T splitting 2 HD / 2 SD and 1 HD / 3 SD into separate service levels?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</guid><description><![CDATA[This reminds me of DSL...in order to get good service you had to live near the LEC.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[retro77]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2008 3:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T splitting 2 HD / 2 SD and 1 HD / 3 SD into separate service levels?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</guid><description><![CDATA[I must admit, I get the U-Verse 2/2 service here just outside of the Houston area, and truly not that impressed since you could watch as many TV's you wanted to in HD with Comcast Cable here. The only reason I switched was because of the amount of HD channels that they carry here in a big metropolitan area. I do miss things like my Weather Channels on Cable from the local affiliates and The Weather Channel Local on The 8's.<br><br>I haven't had any issues except with the known HDMI issue they have with the DVR boxes that they offer you here with U-Verse.<br><br>Wonder when ATT plans on fixing a few of the other bugs they still got in their system as well? ex: macro-blocking, pixelation?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Bramlett]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2008 6:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T splitting 2 HD / 2 SD and 1 HD / 3 SD into separate service levels?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</guid><description><![CDATA[I install uverse for a living and i just have to laugh at this.<br><br>I got the memo a while back about them extending the distance. all i have to say to that is:<br><br>LOL YEA RIGHT.<br><br>we can't even get sync @ 2600 feet most of the time, forget 3000. and they're trying to push to 3400? yea right. that must be the best copper in the world.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nebbeh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2008 1:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T splitting 2 HD / 2 SD and 1 HD / 3 SD into separate service levels?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why would anyone be surprised by any service company employing a nickle and dime approach to their cowsumers? Just be quiet and eat your grass.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GhostDoggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 23rd 2008 6:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T splitting 2 HD / 2 SD and 1 HD / 3 SD into separate service levels?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/22/atandt-splitting-2-hd-2-sd-and-1-hd-3-sd-into-separate-service/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well this 2 HD/ 2 SD is for one dvr. Not the whole house. So multiple rooms can watch HD simultaneously but now you can watch/record one while watching another.<br><br><a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/06/12/attention-u-verse-users-2-hd-2-sd-rollout-schedule-gets-leake/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/06/12/attention-u-verse-users-2-hd-2-sd-rollout-schedule-gets-leake/</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[powermacguy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 23rd 2008 9:44PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>