"The speed is 4 secs for single layer BD and 6 secs for BD DL50. Laughable. Today we have DVDs being replicated with "home business" replicators at the same speed. Not multimillion dollar machines"
That is the stupidest argument I have ever heard. A Single layer BD disc holds more data than a dual layer DVD yet you are comparing the write times of the two? Obviously the DVD's will write faster, its common sense.. then again apparently not as you are arguing the point. Can these "home business" replicators do 25GB's in 4 secs? No, they are doing 9.. not even half of what the BD ones are doing. You can argue things, but this, is unarguable. More data takes more time. How long did the original DVD producers take to do a mere 4.5GB's?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
XeroState @ Jul 7th 2008 10:17PM
"The speed is 4 secs for single layer BD and 6 secs for BD DL50. Laughable. Today we have DVDs being replicated with "home business" replicators at the same speed. Not multimillion dollar machines"
That is the stupidest argument I have ever heard. A Single layer BD disc holds more data than a dual layer DVD yet you are comparing the write times of the two? Obviously the DVD's will write faster, its common sense.. then again apparently not as you are arguing the point. Can these "home business" replicators do 25GB's in 4 secs? No, they are doing 9.. not even half of what the BD ones are doing. You can argue things, but this, is unarguable. More data takes more time. How long did the original DVD producers take to do a mere 4.5GB's?