<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Japanese government to levy royalty fees on BD-Rs / Blu-ray recorders</title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/06/17/japanese-government-to-levy-royalty-fees-on-bd-rs-blu-ray-reco/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Japanese government to levy royalty fees on BD-Rs / Blu-ray recorders</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Japanese government to levy royalty fees on BD-Rs / Blu-ray recorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/06/17/japanese-government-to-levy-royalty-fees-on-bd-rs-blu-ray-reco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/06/17/japanese-government-to-levy-royalty-fees-on-bd-rs-blu-ray-reco/</guid><description><![CDATA[Governments and copyright holders, please choose no more than ONE of the following two options:<br><br>DRM    -or-    fees/taxes to compensate for supposed piracy.<br><br><br>DRM only hurts those that "play fair," as DRM reduces the functionality of media/devices that consumers pay for.<br><br>These fees/taxes hurt everybody...but are especially painful, again, to those who play fair:  why should I pay taxes/royalties to hollywood if I put together a BD-R full of home movies?<br><br>If DRM is doing its job, then there is no reason for the fees/taxes as piracy *should* be impossible or prohibitively expensive.  If DRM isn't doing it's job, then quit putting it on every damn thing you can think of.<br><br>Of course, as a consumer, I would prefer that Governments/Copyright holders choose neither option and just catch the mass-producing pirates out there instead of punishing everybody. <br><br>For them to choose just one option is anti-consumer and mean.<br><br>But choosing both options??!!  Like loading up BD's with DRM and simultaneously charging fees on BD-R media and recorders?  That's like stealing my breakfast and making me vomit up last night's dinner too.  Thanks for nothing, jerks! I'll take my business elsewhere!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EQC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 3:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Japanese government to levy royalty fees on BD-Rs / Blu-ray recorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/06/17/japanese-government-to-levy-royalty-fees-on-bd-rs-blu-ray-reco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/06/17/japanese-government-to-levy-royalty-fees-on-bd-rs-blu-ray-reco/</guid><description><![CDATA[Last time I checked Blu Ray was copy protected so I don't see how they can justify royalty fees on blank media. And if they do mandate royalties on blank media they should outright ban DRM altogether. They shouldn't be allowed to have it both ways.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DrXym]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 6:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Japanese government to levy royalty fees on BD-Rs / Blu-ray recorders]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/06/17/japanese-government-to-levy-royalty-fees-on-bd-rs-blu-ray-reco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/06/17/japanese-government-to-levy-royalty-fees-on-bd-rs-blu-ray-reco/</guid><description><![CDATA[The BD+ copy protection lasted all of 2 weeks before it was cracked.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MadMike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 11:07AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>