<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/30/harman-kardon-intros-avr-354-avr-254-and-avr-154-receivers/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/30/harman-kardon-intros-avr-354-avr-254-and-avr-154-receivers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/30/harman-kardon-intros-avr-354-avr-254-and-avr-154-receivers/</guid><description><![CDATA[Kind of useless. The lack of HDMI ports is a huge turn off. Right now everything, and I mean everything, is HDMI out. I can count upwards of five or six HDMI devices I need to plug into my HDTV, and I'm not even that hardcore of a home audio/theater geek. I can't imagine what the really insane people are doing, they must have twin linked HDMI switch boxes going or something.<br><br>These companies need to start dropping the SVid links and start adding 6-10 HDMI inputs instead. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pip]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 30th 2008 9:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/30/harman-kardon-intros-avr-354-avr-254-and-avr-154-receivers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/30/harman-kardon-intros-avr-354-avr-254-and-avr-154-receivers/</guid><description><![CDATA[It does seem a bit overkill to have 5 s-vid and only 3 HDMI...damn, I thought this could be a contender for my HT, too.  I really like the styling: techy, yet understated]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daaper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 30th 2008 11:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/30/harman-kardon-intros-avr-354-avr-254-and-avr-154-receivers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/30/harman-kardon-intros-avr-354-avr-254-and-avr-154-receivers/</guid><description><![CDATA[jesus christ...5-6, what do u have...i only have a ps3, PC, sat box]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SimbaDogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 30th 2008 3:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/30/harman-kardon-intros-avr-354-avr-254-and-avr-154-receivers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/30/harman-kardon-intros-avr-354-avr-254-and-avr-154-receivers/</guid><description><![CDATA[Am I the only one that thinks that for that kind of money you should be getting more that 75W/channel?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Fuzz 53]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 30th 2008 10:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/30/harman-kardon-intros-avr-354-avr-254-and-avr-154-receivers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/30/harman-kardon-intros-avr-354-avr-254-and-avr-154-receivers/</guid><description><![CDATA[The HK AVR's are not available yet! Also HK's 75 watts are like other companies 125 watts! <br>Research is your friend!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 30th 2008 10:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/30/harman-kardon-intros-avr-354-avr-254-and-avr-154-receivers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/30/harman-kardon-intros-avr-354-avr-254-and-avr-154-receivers/</guid><description><![CDATA[Although I'm a fan of HK I feel they are a little overpriced compared to the features I can get from Onkyo or even Denon.  Anybody else feel this way???]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Smith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 30th 2008 11:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/30/harman-kardon-intros-avr-354-avr-254-and-avr-154-receivers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/30/harman-kardon-intros-avr-354-avr-254-and-avr-154-receivers/</guid><description><![CDATA[Features? Get a JVC if you want a lot of features.  I had a HK and though performance was great.  Not much worse than my Rotel that costs twice as much.  The rotel has two features. Bass and Terrible. I dunno, maybe I'm just cranky about 7.1 9.1 11.2.  90% of the time I just want to listen to music out of some nice 3 way floor speakers.  I hated my 5.1 system with the bookshelves and listening to the crappy music reproduction.  I'm not watching Star Wars anyways..so maybe its just me.  I think I'm going for the HK 3490, $325 at J&R.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Galicki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 30th 2008 11:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/30/harman-kardon-intros-avr-354-avr-254-and-avr-154-receivers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/30/harman-kardon-intros-avr-354-avr-254-and-avr-154-receivers/</guid><description><![CDATA[At least the exterior design is good - this leaves many other co's like Onkyo and Denon in the dust]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Video Master]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 30th 2008 7:15PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>