<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/28/sharp-launches-xg-p560w-65-inch-3-chip-dlp-professional-project/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/28/sharp-launches-xg-p560w-65-inch-3-chip-dlp-professional-project/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/28/sharp-launches-xg-p560w-65-inch-3-chip-dlp-professional-project/</guid><description><![CDATA[With a terrible 1,800:1 contrast ratio and low resolution, this projector is obviously meant for maximum light output for presentations in well-lit boardrooms, not a home theater setup.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. E]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2008 11:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/28/sharp-launches-xg-p560w-65-inch-3-chip-dlp-professional-project/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/05/28/sharp-launches-xg-p560w-65-inch-3-chip-dlp-professional-project/</guid><description><![CDATA[yah, I wouldn't cal this "professional" as much as I would just plain expensive.  A real professional projector would be at least HD, feature BNX connectors, and besides RS242 control, would also have some sort of timecode in.  A totally professional projector would be at least 2K.  Professional this is not.<br><br>-Brian]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Kaempen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2008 3:12PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>