Amen to all those bashing stretch-o-vision! If the goal is to get people to migrate to HD en masse, showing them deformed standard definition content is probably not the best route forward. Never mind stretch-o-vision, what about low bit rates on HD content in general?!? I'd be infinitely more excited about providers using their new sat bandwidth to provide a higher bit rate on the good channels that everyone actually wants to watch.
Before I get flamed, I'm willing to entertain the notion that MonstersHD probably should make that list!
And to the fellow who called the DISH CEO a dooshbag; did you ever think about breaking out the European spelling, "douchebag"? It hits just a little bit harder!
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
mugatu @ May 14th 2008 6:09PM
Did he admit to being a dooshbag too?
Where's my 22 HD channels Charlie? Freaking liar.
Jake @ May 14th 2008 11:46PM
Amen to all those bashing stretch-o-vision! If the goal is to get people to migrate to HD en masse, showing them deformed standard definition content is probably not the best route forward. Never mind stretch-o-vision, what about low bit rates on HD content in general?!? I'd be infinitely more excited about providers using their new sat bandwidth to provide a higher bit rate on the good channels that everyone actually wants to watch.
Before I get flamed, I'm willing to entertain the notion that MonstersHD probably should make that list!
And to the fellow who called the DISH CEO a dooshbag; did you ever think about breaking out the European spelling, "douchebag"? It hits just a little bit harder!
mugatu @ May 15th 2008 6:18PM
@Jake
The spelling was intentional for comedic impact. This is a family site, COME ON!