Skip to Content
How biased of an article! "Right -- which totally explains your prior relationship with HD DVD."yeah because the relationship with HD DVD worked out SOOO well, right? Ever think maybe MS doesn't want to make the same mistake twice?
Umm... biased towards what?
They cant make the same mistake twice. The point was there were competing products then, but there aren't now.And even back then they could have added HDDVD for games or at least integrated, adding a ton more players into the market, the way Bluray did.
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
dman @ May 5th 2008 1:58PM
How biased of an article!
"Right -- which totally explains your prior relationship with HD DVD."
yeah because the relationship with HD DVD worked out SOOO well, right? Ever think maybe MS doesn't want to make the same mistake twice?
Ryan J. @ May 5th 2008 2:06PM
Umm... biased towards what?
Andy @ May 6th 2008 4:53PM
They cant make the same mistake twice. The point was there were competing products then, but there aren't now.
And even back then they could have added HDDVD for games or at least integrated, adding a ton more players into the market, the way Bluray did.