<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Pioneer BDP-95FD review</title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Pioneer BDP-95FD review</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dude, either get a tripod or crop your pictures so they don't come out 15 degrees off center.<br>Thanks anyway.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr Stevo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 2:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA["Dude" - have you ever taken flash photos before?  FYI, there is this thing called "reflection".  Reflection happens when the flash from a camera bounces off of a shiny, mirror-like surface back to the camera lens.  It is particularly pronounced when the angle between the lens and surface is 90 degrees.<br><br>In case you hadn't noticed, Pioneer takes great pride in the shiny, mirror-like surfaces of their Elite branded equipment.  Many television displays also include shiny, mirror-like surfaces.  I would surmise that is why all the photos are taken at an angle rather than because the photographer didn't have a tripod.  Dude.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 5:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Although Pioneer puts out some good stuff, their gear always looks like it was designed in the 80's.  Their LCD look like the same ones used on VCRs, the boxes look like, well, VCRs.  Again, their stuff is good, but please spend some time on making them look up to date.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr Stevo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 2:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Load times are a deal breaker for me. I'll continue with my fast-loading PS3 for now, kthxbye.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DEEZNUTZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 2:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Word.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[takamaru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 2:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Funny how comparisons used to be HD DVD vs. Bluray.  And instead of focusing on bluray vs. DVD, I guess I'll do: Hardware ratio: 90:10 PS3 vs. all other standalone bluray players. PS3 FTW!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wysiwyg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 2:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is this the same as the LX70A that is available in Europe? Because if it is, you guys get a much better deal! Mine cost 900 quid.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 2:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is a dead issue this unit is already discontinued.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 3:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not a dead issue until the replacement is available.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 3:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[For a $1000 player to not have internal DTS-HD MA decoding is absolutely FUGLY. What about people who finally bought a HDMI (1.2) receiver a year ago costing $2000, and thinking 'great, this will do me for a LONG time now'.<br><br>Not so. What makes it worse, is that for a player to have successful internal decoding it must have good processing power. Which will delay my purchase for an inexpensive blu-ray player compatible with my setup even MORE.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pquistgard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 3:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Come on guys, I've had this hooked up to my 46XBR4 for nearly 3 months now and you're only just getting the review?<br><br>One thing you failed to mention was the OUTSTANDING upconvert quality from normal DVD's. I had an HD-XA2 prior to Warner's Announcement (quickly sold and jumped ship!) and the 95FD does significantly better than the XA2 in my opinion.<br><br>Watching Blue Planet (on DVD) looks better than watching most of the NGC or DHDTh programs via Cox (but then again, Cox blows goats for quarters)<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Britboyj27]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 8:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, you dropped your XA2 for this!?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2008 2:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ben, you say "Best of the best" and then your review shows lots of "bad and ugly". Is that really the best Blu-ray has to offer ? This thing is outdated (no profile 1.1), does not output DTS-HD MA through analog outs, fails HQV tests... and costs 1K $<br><br>"Best of the best" ? Really ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2008 8:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Jay,<br>There is no perfect Blu-ray player (HD DVD either for that matter, but the XA2 was close), and "the best" depends on your needs.<br><br>Profile 1.1, who cares. Not everyone likes PiP. <br>HQV, only applies to converting resolutions, and since most discs are 1080p you'll never use it.<br><br>If you have a new AV/R like the one we tested with, you don't use the internal decoder.<br><br>Personally if it had an RS-232 port, it would be perfect.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2008 8:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[What is pioneer thinking making this player part of their "ELITE" product line, charging $1k, and not even putting an RS-232 port on it???!?! Fact is a large percentage of people willing to spend $1k on a player will probably want to use the RS-232 for control. <br>Anyways.. isn't this review a little late considering this player has been out for a long time and is now discontinued?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2008 8:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree on the RS-232. <br><br>The one they sent me was new, plus when we get the new one we'll be able to compare. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2008 8:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Who cares about profile 1.1 (PIP) ? Ben: Tell me you did a survey and that the results show that people care more about RS-232 than "flashy features". <br><br>Of course "not everyone" want all the features. As a reviewer, you should be more objective and look at the facts, not you personal likings. Sure, I like reading about your opinion, but after reading your review, I don't feel this is a "Top player". <br><br>But... In a player costing 1000$, RS-232 should probably be included. After all, it's "Elite". It should also be more up-to-date than the PS3.<br><br>My point is, "Best of the best" should be "close to perfect", if not perfect. When you look at any given format, I would think that "Top" would describe a player that has all the latest features of the format. This one doesn't.<br><br>Sure, you like this player a lot. Just say so. Oh, I think you did. <br><br>It's just that the first line of your review made me think that this player was "it". <br><br>But is ain't. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2008 11:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Jay,<br>Yeah I went back and forth about that, I though about putting "near the top" or "around the top". Either way, it's the best player I've reviewed to date, and best is not analogous to perfect. Although the BD-P1400, was really nice too. Ultimately it was the usability and quality of the player that pushed it above the rest, not the feature set.<br><br>You don't have to do a review of a product to rate them by feature set, you simply line up the features and check them off. I don't think anyone comes here to find a feature check list -- at least I hope not.<br><br>I'd bet that the Panny is just as nice, but I'm having a hard time getting in contact with the right person over there to get me one. I've though about "renting" one, but yeah. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2008 12:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pioneer BDP-95FD review]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/pioneer-bdp-95fd-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm actually waiting for the Panasonic. Can't wait until you guys annonce a release date and price. ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2008 2:35PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>