<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Canon dumps rear projection development, focused on SED</title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/canon-dumps-rear-projection-development-focused-on-sed/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Canon dumps rear projection development, focused on SED</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon dumps rear projection development, focused on SED]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/canon-dumps-rear-projection-development-focused-on-sed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/canon-dumps-rear-projection-development-focused-on-sed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Canon made RPTV's?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hooterman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 10:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon dumps rear projection development, focused on SED]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/canon-dumps-rear-projection-development-focused-on-sed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/canon-dumps-rear-projection-development-focused-on-sed/</guid><description><![CDATA["Even with Canon's Hitachi/Panasonic flat panel tie-up, ---> its ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GrammrCheckr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 11:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon dumps rear projection development, focused on SED]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/canon-dumps-rear-projection-development-focused-on-sed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/canon-dumps-rear-projection-development-focused-on-sed/</guid><description><![CDATA[more SED news to ignore]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[steedums]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 11:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon dumps rear projection development, focused on SED]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/canon-dumps-rear-projection-development-focused-on-sed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/canon-dumps-rear-projection-development-focused-on-sed/</guid><description><![CDATA[And why ignore what is one of the most promising technologies for future TVs ? Because it's late ? Come on... How many years have we waited for the first OLED TV ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Franssu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 21st 2008 11:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon dumps rear projection development, focused on SED]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/canon-dumps-rear-projection-development-focused-on-sed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/canon-dumps-rear-projection-development-focused-on-sed/</guid><description><![CDATA[So if I understand correctly, they are getting out of the TV business that they never got into in the first place, and oh yeah, some moronic company is still suing them over SED technology that could have been great but will never see the light of day.<br><br>So cannon is still making cameras and printers like always.<br><br>Where's the news here?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 4:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon dumps rear projection development, focused on SED]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/canon-dumps-rear-projection-development-focused-on-sed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/canon-dumps-rear-projection-development-focused-on-sed/</guid><description><![CDATA[i want to believe in SED, as much as i believe in OLED. But i need to see some physical evidence of it real soon. After all, I'm an atheist, and i don't make decisions based on beliefs, but on hard facts.<br><br>From what i understand of the manufacturing process, SED should be able to be relatively inexpensive to mass produce, given an acceptably low DOA rate.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hans Martin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 5:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon dumps rear projection development, focused on SED]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/canon-dumps-rear-projection-development-focused-on-sed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/03/19/canon-dumps-rear-projection-development-focused-on-sed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Already, old technology.  OLED is superior in everyway and is already available (although limited in size) at your local Sony Store. OLED will be the dominating FP device in the next 2-3 years.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HDpurist]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 5:45PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>