If you work in the industry, why don't you know that Blu-Ray recorders were first to market in Japan by about 2-3 years? How is this DOA?
"Compression done right" is indeed the key. And given the noticeable digital artifacts on so many HD-DVD and lowest-common-denominator Blu-Rays (compressed to fit on HD-DVD and put on Blu-Ray too) I have seen, obviously the "done right" is sorely lacking in the industry. We still get DVDs that have noticeable artifacts even after so long in the industry.
The basic fact of the matter is that more space gives you a better chance at a "compression done right." And I don't think there's been a single "compression done wrong" on any of the 35-45 GB Blu-Ray encodes, based on my own viewing and reviews on the net.
If HD-DVD couldn't get rid of noticeable/distracting artifacts, there's very little hope for 1080p digital downloads (note that XBL and iTunes don't even try 1080p, they're both 720p).
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
EatingPie @ Mar 18th 2008 1:16PM
If you work in the industry, why don't you know that Blu-Ray recorders were first to market in Japan by about 2-3 years? How is this DOA?
"Compression done right" is indeed the key. And given the noticeable digital artifacts on so many HD-DVD and lowest-common-denominator Blu-Rays (compressed to fit on HD-DVD and put on Blu-Ray too) I have seen, obviously the "done right" is sorely lacking in the industry. We still get DVDs that have noticeable artifacts even after so long in the industry.
The basic fact of the matter is that more space gives you a better chance at a "compression done right." And I don't think there's been a single "compression done wrong" on any of the 35-45 GB Blu-Ray encodes, based on my own viewing and reviews on the net.
If HD-DVD couldn't get rid of noticeable/distracting artifacts, there's very little hope for 1080p digital downloads (note that XBL and iTunes don't even try 1080p, they're both 720p).
-Pie