Movies on a flash drive not apt to boom anytime soon
Earlier this month, we disagreed that HD movie downloads would trump HD DVD / Blu-ray disc purchases in the not-too-distant future, and now we've got yet another clever alternative on deck that just doesn't have the makings of a winner. While it seems that consumers still prefer something tangible when purchasing movies, we can't help but agree that flicks on flash drives just wouldn't work. Aside from the prohibitive cost to pop out a standard DVD on a flash chip versus a disc, the idea of having customers flock to some sort of movie download kiosk to refill memory cards with new releases just seems absurd. Sure, we understand how this could sound marginally appealing from the sidelines, but we just can't imagine all those DVD cases at your favorite big box retailer getting swapped out with movie-filled SDHC cards anytime soon.























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Papytendo @ Feb 23rd 2008 8:01PM
Where did you find that Micro SD card or is it fake?
JeffDM @ Feb 23rd 2008 10:13PM
I'm pretty sure it's called Photoshop.
Killer @ Feb 24th 2008 9:59AM
It's a real SD card...
http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/sandisk-crams-12gb-onto-a-microsdhc-card/
No Photoshop used.
Mr. E @ Feb 23rd 2008 8:03PM
I can see some sort of solid state format possibly gaining traction eventually, but I can't picture it within at least the next ten years. I personally feel that 1080p, lossless audio Blu-ray will meet my home theater needs for the indefinite future.
Ken @ Feb 23rd 2008 8:10PM
Well, for one, what are the costs of write-once vs. ultra-hi-speed rewritable cards designed for cameras?
Isn't Kodak trying to push out 1GB SD and CF cards for $5 (retail price) as 'film' that you could buy at the zoo, Disneyland, etc. if you run out of room?
But no matter, a 32GB card is not going to be cheap (read: $1-2) for a while unless there is a big technological jump.
kevin @ Feb 23rd 2008 10:49PM
I'm pretty sure that if anyone inked a deal with Disney where the big D charged $5 for the memory card, it would mean Kodak's only selling them for about 25 cents. Anything more, and Disney would be charging more like $20-25.
tcrone @ Feb 23rd 2008 8:52PM
Once the capacities of these cards increases and cost comes down, it becomes a viable option. I'd take this over BlueRay.
JeffDM @ Feb 23rd 2008 10:19PM
By that time, you can just do digital downloads. Blu-Ray discs cost $2 a piece in volume to press & package, right now. Even an 8 GB read-only card has to be a LOT more than that.
jesusRvd @ Feb 23rd 2008 9:06PM
that would be kinda cool tho.altho u would need a tv (or watever) to have like ten inputs and then pik wich u wanna see. but id rather have to repair scratches then drop the lil card everytime i wanna get it out hahah
Doc @ Feb 23rd 2008 9:18PM
It's a shame that the companies that make these don't try to push for cheaper higher capcity cards because think of the size of the player that would use this, it could be the size of an ipod with no moving parts!!! They don't have to be a micro card either, but any small card would be nice. My only question is can these cards produce the same quality as disks? If they can't then i'll stick with disks, but I do like the smaller size and no moving parts so my battery in my notebook would last longer too!
Mr. E @ Feb 23rd 2008 10:04PM
Hypothetically, if you could have a flash memory card that held 50 GB at the right price, you could have identical quality to Blu-ray. The problems are dual: A 32 GB SDHC card is going for around $700 right now. Second is that data on a flash drive will have a shorter life span than data stored in an optical format like a BD.
I think there will have to be some new form of solid state storage developed before this is even a possibility. Personally, I'm holding out for the Babylon 5-style "data crystal".
Killer @ Feb 23rd 2008 9:55PM
There is only one reason (besides the development of 50 GB SD cards) why this wouldn't happen. It's not because of the idea, it's who owns what. Seeing that for example SanDisk owns the patents, etc. Why would Sony, Panasonic, Toshiba, Samsung etc...want Sandisk getting all the royalties? They wouldn't. It's all about the money, if SD cards could work, it would never get off the ground because companies like Sony, Panasonic, Toshiba and Samsung would get less of the pie. Money royalist drive the development of new formats, Plain and Simple.
mitch @ Feb 24th 2008 1:09AM
Another big reason why it will take a while; there are a lot of different formats of memory cards. Which companpy will get the royalties off all the memory card sales?? Can you say format war times 4.
Mark @ Feb 24th 2008 12:53PM
The days of physical media are over. I just wish I wasn't the only one who thought that.
kcjones @ Feb 25th 2008 2:17PM
The idea of flash cards being used by rental companies such as Blockbuster or Netflix is intriguing. Imagine buying an SD card and filling up the card at a kiosk in the local 7 Eleven or gas station. Creating a viable DRM would be key. Otherwise, it would save rental companies millions of dollars, and give customers more accessibility to the latest Movie releases.