Consumer friendly, cheaper, better featured HD DVD to have won would have been better. I agree with above poster though ^^^^^ This site did every thing in it's power to destroy HD DVD, now the golden goose has been dorked, enghd is trying to reignite the war again. What a pitiful excuse for an article, trying to lift the flagging hit rate, this site is now paying the price for it's one eyed stand.
"Consumer friendly, cheaper, better featured HD DVD to have won would have been better." -- If anything the "better featured" player was less consumer friendly than the Blu-Ray players. How many main stream consumers want to, or even understand how to run a network connection to their DVD player? How many consumers understand interactive features? Just play the damn movies. That's why I don't give a rip about Blu-Ray 1.1 or 2.0. My movies will still play. And don't even get me started on the mistake of pitching "cheap" to the High Definition Television owning audience.
"What a pitiful excuse for an article, trying to lift the flagging hit rate, this site is now paying the price for it's one eyed stand." -- Seems like it worked, they got your hit. Obviously people are interested. Why wouldn't they continue to post articles of interest on the EngadgetHD site?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Gus @ Feb 22nd 2008 8:02PM
Consumer friendly, cheaper, better featured HD DVD to have won would have been better.
I agree with above poster though ^^^^^
This site did every thing in it's power to destroy HD DVD, now the golden goose has been dorked, enghd is trying to reignite the war again.
What a pitiful excuse for an article, trying to lift the flagging hit rate, this site is now paying the price for it's one eyed stand.
mugatu @ Feb 23rd 2008 1:18AM
"Consumer friendly, cheaper, better featured HD DVD to have won would have been better." --
If anything the "better featured" player was less consumer friendly than the Blu-Ray players. How many main stream consumers want to, or even understand how to run a network connection to their DVD player? How many consumers understand interactive features? Just play the damn movies. That's why I don't give a rip about Blu-Ray 1.1 or 2.0. My movies will still play. And don't even get me started on the mistake of pitching "cheap" to the High Definition Television owning audience.
"What a pitiful excuse for an article, trying to lift the flagging hit rate, this site is now paying the price for it's one eyed stand." --
Seems like it worked, they got your hit. Obviously people are interested. Why wouldn't they continue to post articles of interest on the EngadgetHD site?