http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/02/21/sonys-bravia-f-series-is-no-wallflower/ Engadget HD Comments for http://www.engadgethd.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadgethd.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/02/21/sonys-bravia-f-series-is-no-wallflower/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/02/21/sonys-bravia-f-series-is-no-wallflower/Feb 21st 2008 4:38AMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2008/02/21/sonys-bravia-f-series-is-no-wallflower/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/02/21/sonys-bravia-f-series-is-no-wallflower/
And has anyone used a modern IR remote these days? You don't really have to point them directly at the set anymore. I can point my remote at any part of the room, even behind me, and it works just fine.]]>Feb 21st 2008 10:21AMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2008/02/21/sonys-bravia-f-series-is-no-wallflower/http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/02/21/sonys-bravia-f-series-is-no-wallflower/
3000:1 is better than the theatrical DLP projectors used in movies theatres. That is for non-dynamic simultaneous contrast on a checkerboard pattern.

Number that are better than that are always suspect by me. Displays all have there own amount of internal reelections. That means a bright white spot will spread into dark areas reducing contrast ratios.

The Bravias *usually* use the harder to do good in realistic measurements. ]]>Feb 21st 2008 2:20PM