Funny, you sound surprised. Seen that a lot here, people discussing the technical merits of one format over the other.
When did we start believing that the best one would win? Is that how George Bush got elected president (twice) because he was the best person for the job?
It was never about the spec. It was never about which one was "better" It never is. It is about money, power and influence. Always.
I must say, it has been fun watching the debate, this is better, that is better. In the end, it made no difference. It was never about us, what we thought, what we liked. Get over it.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
roger_huston @ Feb 13th 2008 2:18AM
Funny, you sound surprised. Seen that a lot here, people discussing the technical merits of one format over the other.
When did we start believing that the best one would win? Is that how George Bush got elected president (twice) because he was the best person for the job?
It was never about the spec. It was never about which one was "better" It never is. It is about money, power and influence. Always.
I must say, it has been fun watching the debate, this is better, that is better. In the end, it made no difference. It was never about us, what we thought, what we liked. Get over it.
- Roger