Well, like everyone who defends Blu-ray like the BDA is paying them keeps on saying about the whole business about 3 different hardware profiles, who cares about extras, right? HD DVD has had the better extras since the hardware was complete before launch (what a concept...), and everyone keeps saying that the extras don't matter, probably to make themselves feel better about buying a 1.0 Blu-ray player. So this is kind of non-news, right? Just curious. You can't have it both ways. Either the extras don't matter and this story is just words, or extras do matter, and here come all the Nelson-style "ha-ha!" comments. Gee. I wonder what's going to happen...
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
anon @ Jan 31st 2008 1:27PM
Well, like everyone who defends Blu-ray like the BDA is paying them keeps on saying about the whole business about 3 different hardware profiles, who cares about extras, right? HD DVD has had the better extras since the hardware was complete before launch (what a concept...), and everyone keeps saying that the extras don't matter, probably to make themselves feel better about buying a 1.0 Blu-ray player. So this is kind of non-news, right? Just curious. You can't have it both ways. Either the extras don't matter and this story is just words, or extras do matter, and here come all the Nelson-style "ha-ha!" comments. Gee. I wonder what's going to happen...
Dan @ Jan 31st 2008 2:23PM
I won't ever watch them to 1.0 is fine for watching all the movies and for what I need.