<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/27/charter-adding-three-new-hd-channels-to-st-louis-missouri-line/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/27/charter-adding-three-new-hd-channels-to-st-louis-missouri-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/27/charter-adding-three-new-hd-channels-to-st-louis-missouri-line/</guid><description><![CDATA[No CBS (sigh)? How can a cable company NOT have at least the major networks in HD?  I have Charter in Connecticut and we're still waiting for ABC and CW (we do get CBS).   My understand is that it has to do with the fact that ABC wants Charter to pay extra for the HD version while the other networks provide the HD feed for free (true?). Is this just a Charter problem or do lots of other cable providers skimp on networks?  I'd rather have ABC than Mojo... or whatever other nitch crap they're adding next.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kmarsh_2001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2008 1:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/27/charter-adding-three-new-hd-channels-to-st-louis-missouri-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/27/charter-adding-three-new-hd-channels-to-st-louis-missouri-line/</guid><description><![CDATA[Same problem with CBS in St. Louis.  CBS wants Charter to pay, and Charter doesn't want to pass the cost on to their customers.  I think I'm on Charter's side.  The CBS signal is free OTA, why should Charter have to pay to redistribute it.  I think it hurts CBS more than Charter.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Childress]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2008 1:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/27/charter-adding-three-new-hd-channels-to-st-louis-missouri-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/27/charter-adding-three-new-hd-channels-to-st-louis-missouri-line/</guid><description><![CDATA[Shouldn't CBS be carried due to "Must Carry" rules?  With NTSC going away next year, how will CBS come in?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2008 3:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/27/charter-adding-three-new-hd-channels-to-st-louis-missouri-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/27/charter-adding-three-new-hd-channels-to-st-louis-missouri-line/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wouldn't think the "must carry" rule implies they have to carry the HD version, just the SD, even when TV goes all digital.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kmarsh_2001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2008 5:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/27/charter-adding-three-new-hd-channels-to-st-louis-missouri-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/27/charter-adding-three-new-hd-channels-to-st-louis-missouri-line/</guid><description><![CDATA[they have the SD version.<br><br><br>I say forget all the providers though.  I pick up the big four plus the WB and someone else in HD with my 50 dollar radioshack antenna about 20 miles from downtown.  It's hard to beat an antenna and a TIVO S3/HD if you live near a metro area.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2008 6:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/27/charter-adding-three-new-hd-channels-to-st-louis-missouri-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/27/charter-adding-three-new-hd-channels-to-st-louis-missouri-line/</guid><description><![CDATA[You can actually preview the Discovery HD and Golf HD on channels 115-1 and 115-2.  They come through unencrypted through basic cable line to the TV.  Must be using them to test it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[timtlm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2008 3:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/27/charter-adding-three-new-hd-channels-to-st-louis-missouri-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/27/charter-adding-three-new-hd-channels-to-st-louis-missouri-line/</guid><description><![CDATA[You can actually preview the Discovery HD and Golf HD on channels115-1 and 115-2. They come through unencrypted through basic cableline to the TV. Must be using them to test it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[timtlm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2008 3:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/27/charter-adding-three-new-hd-channels-to-st-louis-missouri-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/27/charter-adding-three-new-hd-channels-to-st-louis-missouri-line/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, as a matter of fact the new tv's have a tuner capable of decoding the HD broadcasts.  They live in the lower 100s.  Just like the over the air HD sigs live on 5.1, 5.2, etc, Charter has them on the likes of 105-1,-2.  I'm looking for a lineup on the internet but can't find one.  IF anyone has done this for St. Louis, please mail me one. :))]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[abaer01]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 6th 2008 1:08PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>