<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Eyes-on: Samsung's 82-inch QuadHD &amp; 52-inch Ultra Slim LCDs</title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/09/eyes-on-samsungs-82-inch-quadhd-and-52-inch-ultra-slim-lcds/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Eyes-on: Samsung's 82-inch QuadHD &amp; 52-inch Ultra Slim LCDs</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Eyes-on: Samsung's 82-inch QuadHD &amp; 52-inch Ultra Slim LCDs]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/09/eyes-on-samsungs-82-inch-quadhd-and-52-inch-ultra-slim-lcds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/09/eyes-on-samsungs-82-inch-quadhd-and-52-inch-ultra-slim-lcds/</guid><description><![CDATA[The LCD factory I believe outputs 82 inch slabs (or multiples thereof), and that is where the 82 inch comes from. :-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Rejhon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2008 8:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Eyes-on: Samsung's 82-inch QuadHD &amp; 52-inch Ultra Slim LCDs]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/09/eyes-on-samsungs-82-inch-quadhd-and-52-inch-ultra-slim-lcds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/09/eyes-on-samsungs-82-inch-quadhd-and-52-inch-ultra-slim-lcds/</guid><description><![CDATA[So, according to the chart... <br><a href="http://s3.carltonbale.com/resolution_chart.html" rel="nofollow">http://s3.carltonbale.com/resolution_chart.html</a><br><br>If you were sitting the standard 10 feet or so away... you would need a tv that is 10 feet across to be able the see this.<br><br>That just seems stupid to me.  They should work on making the TVs cost less and look better, not stupid crap like this.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2008 10:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Eyes-on: Samsung's 82-inch QuadHD &amp; 52-inch Ultra Slim LCDs]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/09/eyes-on-samsungs-82-inch-quadhd-and-52-inch-ultra-slim-lcds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/09/eyes-on-samsungs-82-inch-quadhd-and-52-inch-ultra-slim-lcds/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anyone else notice the moire patterns in some of those photos?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[justadcomics]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2008 10:51AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>