http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/ Engadget HD Comments for Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production http://www.engadgethd.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadgethd.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/Dec 31st 2007 4:59PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/Mar 5th 2008 9:16PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/ OLED. At least there are OLED products on the market and in use in common electronics like some MP3 players, etc.

Also, I thought the jist of the lawsuit just prevented them from sharing the technology with Toshiba. Now that they've bought out Toshiba's shares of the joint-venture, what is preventing them from using the Nano-Proprietary tech again?]]>Dec 31st 2007 6:31PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/Dec 31st 2007 8:20PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/
As for duke nukem, Well no1 has ever seen any sort of gameplay (just that lame trailer that was recently released which was all cgi). So it does not really exsist.]]>Jan 1st 2008 4:11PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/Jan 1st 2008 6:11PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/Jan 1st 2008 7:22PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/
SED has no image quality advantages over oled devices. The main advantage of sed was the ability to leverage existing CRT plants in production. Meaning large cheap displays.

Sed are not flat. They are like micro crts with one electron gun per pixel. They use phosphers step up transformers and glass. They are much thicker than both LCD and PDP and much heavier.

The price of a 42" lcd panel is $700 at my local best buy.

Sed would have to release this year to have a chance to compete. It is for all effect a dead technology that will under deliver compared to LCD's of the time.]]>Jan 2nd 2008 2:35AMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/you actually understood how these panels work
you would not open your mouth]]>Mar 5th 2008 9:16PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/Feb 10th 2008 9:21PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/Feb 17th 2008 9:53PM