No, TNA Impact was in HD and it looked great. Trust me, I can tell the different between Stretchovision. I'm a definite videophile. It was 16:9 1080i HD, I am about 99.999% sure. It was long before they went to Spike TV. It was INHD or INHD2, which were an HD only channels, no stretchovision. Maybe that had to deal with In Demand with the HD cameras. Which is why I always wondered why if TNA did it a few years ago, why did it take WWE so long.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Marrvia @ Dec 28th 2007 8:51PM
No, TNA Impact was in HD and it looked great. Trust me, I can tell the different between Stretchovision. I'm a definite videophile. It was 16:9 1080i HD, I am about 99.999% sure. It was long before they went to Spike TV. It was INHD or INHD2, which were an HD only channels, no stretchovision. Maybe that had to deal with In Demand with the HD cameras. Which is why I always wondered why if TNA did it a few years ago, why did it take WWE so long.