"I'm sure if this was a $200 Blu Ray player you wouldn't exactly be "underwhelmed""
If there was a $200 Blu-ray player, then it would be a new low and it would be 1080p. Why would he be underwhelmed? It would be great news. Why would anyone buy this two bit Chinese player over Toshiba's $199 player, considering it also comes with 5 free movies?
Why would a $200 bluray player for sure be playing 1080p? i'm sure if they wanted to make a budget player they'd use cheaper hardware that can only supply the 1080i bandwidth... which in the end doesn't matter for 24p source material.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Sy @ Nov 29th 2007 3:52PM
"I'm sure if this was a $200 Blu Ray player you wouldn't exactly be "underwhelmed""
If there was a $200 Blu-ray player, then it would be a new low and it would be 1080p. Why would he be underwhelmed? It would be great news. Why would anyone buy this two bit Chinese player over Toshiba's $199 player, considering it also comes with 5 free movies?
Mike Botros @ Nov 29th 2007 4:17PM
Why would a $200 bluray player for sure be playing 1080p? i'm sure if they wanted to make a budget player they'd use cheaper hardware that can only supply the 1080i bandwidth... which in the end doesn't matter for 24p source material.