IBM files patent app for non-skippable DVD advertisements
While we've seen a slew of patent applications revolving around DVR-based ad skipping, IBM is apparently looking to get in on the action with DVDs that feature non-skippable advertisements. As David Freeberg noted, we too are pretty surprised that such an idea isn't already patented, but nevertheless, the theory in and of itself is a double-edged sword. At first glance, hearing that we'd be forced to watch plugs -- which could be stored on the DVD itself or retrieved via the internet -- on our flicks doesn't exactly incite fits of jubilation, but as Freeberg points out, this could be used to offset or at least subsidize the actual cost of DVDs. Additionally, we could envision marketers licking their chops at the chance to insert modern, relevant ads into films via the web, but the actual impact on the consumer still seems murky. 'Course, there's no telling whether or not this patent will be granted, but it opens up some interesting avenues, nonetheless.[Via ZatzNotFunny]
















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
chrisbpearson @ Nov 29th 2007 5:59AM
Does anyone really think that the movie studios will actually price their DVDs less because of this? I get annoyed when I can't skip passed the FBI Warning. I don't want to have to deal with having to watch ads after I've paid for the DVD.
scaught @ Nov 29th 2007 8:09AM
I totally agree with you. There is no way this will bring down the cost of DVDs (or HD-DVD / Blu Ray).
Case in point, my local theater. My local theater starting including more and more ads at the start of a film. I was annoyed but was optimistic that this would offset the rise in ticket prices. This was so not the case. Every week the price went up (from $8.75 to the current price of $10.25). DVDs will be the same way.
Also look at the world of videogames. Tons of games now include in game advertising but this does not come as a cost savings to the consumer.
IBM, you are evil little people.
Hermiod @ Nov 29th 2007 7:47AM
I'd just like to ask IBM what the hell they're thinking ?
It's bad enough that I have to sit through anti-piracy messages on DVDs that I paid for - messages that will be removed in any pirate copies - without ads as well.
The whole point of buying DVDs is to avoid ads. I am happy paying directly for the content. Most likely we will end up with ad-supported discs at current prices and "premium" no-ads versions at higher prices.
blade417 @ Nov 29th 2007 8:34AM
I don't mind too much. It just gives me time to throw a bag of popcorn in the microwave.
T-bone @ Nov 29th 2007 9:01AM
Bring on the hacked firmware to skip these forced ads.
Mojo_Yugen @ Nov 29th 2007 9:13AM
So now I'll have even less incentive to buy DVDs (with ads) rather than steal a pirated version (with no ads)?
Yea, this is a good idea.
Pekingman @ Nov 29th 2007 10:58AM
WINNER!!!! DING, DING, DING!!! Best commented post. Haven't we had enough of the advertising in this society? I'm all about a consumer, capitalistic structure, but that entails choices.......which includes the CHOICE to not watch ads on content that we buy. Want to watch the content free? Fine, subsidize it with ads, but don't you dare force that bullshit on me when I pay for it. When will these companies realize that policies and actions like this and DRM only encourage and promote piracy as they are NOT catering to what the consumer wants and those people WILL overcome the obstacles in their way to get what they want.
Oh, I love DVD Shrink..........
Agus @ Nov 29th 2007 9:35AM
They won't reduce prices... I don't believe so
http://www.spymac.com/details/?2309609
LiqwidZero @ Nov 29th 2007 10:34AM
I'm just happy HD DVD/BD either doesn't have commercials or only has one. Skip it and the movie begins.
Jump into the new era of DVD and you don't have to worry about commercials on disc anymore.
Iridium @ Nov 29th 2007 12:41PM
And why is this a patentable thing?
A patent for ads that don't skip. So if you make unskippable ads you have to pay IBM. Further proof of a patent system out of control.
VoodooZ @ Nov 29th 2007 1:27PM
Long Live the Pirates!!!
Roberta @ Nov 29th 2007 2:30PM
IBM screwed up in the PC hardware department, in the operating system department and in many other areas. It sounds like it wants to screw itself again. Go ahead, IBM, this will bring you "wonderful" publicity.
JeffDM @ Nov 29th 2007 4:56PM
Some studios had put ads on DVDs that can't be skipped by legit players, but the people that bought them got pissed and in general, the studios in question backed off. If they didn't back off, then it would either kill DVD sales or push people to buy hacked or gray market players that ignores the stupid UOP stuff.
I would only accept them if they were free.
Region Free HD @ Nov 29th 2007 5:00PM
Yes! Wonderful! This is just what I've been waiting for!
We can only hope they're also working on a way to pump ads directly into our visual and auditory cortices, too!
Thank you, IBM!
I'm gonna go smash my head against the wall now! Yay!
uagent @ Nov 29th 2007 8:00PM
Well, I say wonderful! Like the Lotus interface patents, I can only pray they hold this patent tight and/or make the royalties so ridiculously high that nobody licenses the patent...
Of course playing any DVD in gxine (legally grey in the US) doesn't follow no-skip rules anyway, so this is a moot point for me.
hch @ Nov 29th 2007 9:45PM
Our friends at SlySoft will undoubtedly make quick work of this. Best of luck to the advertisers! There is a reason that people PAY for subscription satellite radio, etc. Post no bills!
Carbonize @ Nov 30th 2007 12:56AM
VLC, that wonderful player for your computer, skips straight to the DVD menu by default thereby bypassing the ads and stupid anti piracy crap. If only stand alone players would offer this.
Axel @ Dec 22nd 2007 1:44PM
As IBM isn't going after the consumer industry at all, I doubt that we will see this "feature" implemented anywhere soon. But if you've followed the recent lawsuit NetApp vs. Sun, it gives us a hint why companies are collecting patents for apparently banal things: NetApp sued Sun for patent infringement on cluster file systems, and in response Sun counter-sued NetApp for usage of the NFS protocol (which is really banal in the server world). This will certainly end in an amicable arrangement.
Therefore, it pays to have a lot of patents burried in the backyard, even unclaimed ones.
That's how it works, folks...