You know, if you consider a secondary TV, the price tag would need to change. I had a friend who picked up a 42in Panny 720p Plasma for $1099. Sometimes we have to consider not all ppl are going for cutting edge or anything near that. Plasmas seem to be a lot better for even non-HD content vs. LCD.
It is funny that they're calling it the "world's first" 32 inch plasma. Fujitsu, Philips, and a few others have all released 32 inch plasmas, several years back.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
domerdel @ Oct 22nd 2007 12:34AM
You know, if you consider a secondary TV, the price tag would need to change. I had a friend who picked up a 42in Panny 720p Plasma for $1099. Sometimes we have to consider not all ppl are going for cutting edge or anything near that. Plasmas seem to be a lot better for even non-HD content vs. LCD.
TrentD @ Oct 22nd 2007 8:42AM
It is funny that they're calling it the "world's first" 32 inch plasma. Fujitsu, Philips, and a few others have all released 32 inch plasmas, several years back.