<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</guid><description><![CDATA[Let's not pretend about the intentions of CableCARD.<br><br>They were intended to satisfy the FCCs desire for open access to cable networks for CE companies without forcing the cable companies to actually provide open access.<br><br>What the FCC and consumers want is to be able to buy and use flexible, innovative gear on their cable networks. Not just DVRs... gear that can use the cable signal to do truly special things, cheaply, and without having to beg the cable company to support it.<br><br>The cable companies have no intention of letting that happen. CableCARD was merely the first of many steps towards that goal, and that one step took 10 years of fighting to win. And even now, the cable companies are doing their level best to make sure it doesn't get off the ground by sealing CableCARDs in with boxes and by stifling approval of CableCARD devices.<br><br>So CableCARD has been a success... just not for consumers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[UnnDunn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2007 12:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</guid><description><![CDATA[I give ccs a 5 out of 10. The implementation is not that bad, the industry support sucks. My TiVo Series 3 works great (after 3 install trips). Once the hardware issues are squared away I can see cc slots becomming common in PCs (3-5 years). I believe the majority of problems getting cc devices certified has more to do with DRM and securing media than the cable industry trying to protect it's own.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Maki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2007 12:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</guid><description><![CDATA[at least not with Mediacom in the Southeast.  I tried to have one installed and the technician didn't even know how to install it.  he had a failure rate 90% with Mediacom.  i don't think they train the techs for cablecards.  They don't want them to work because they can't sale PPV and it less profitable than a digital box.  The FCC needs more regulations.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2007 1:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would be interested to know if anyone has had a truly great experience with Cablecard.  Or even a 'somewhat painless' experience.<br><br>I had one in my TV for 5 days, and it was a disaster.  All I wanted was the ability to watch HD television, no Tivo, no cablebox, just television.  The installers were clueless and phone support really didn't understand what I was talking about.<br><br>Cablecard is going nowhere until it just works, right out of the box and that is never going to happen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2007 2:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</guid><description><![CDATA[Its working in my Samsung TV and my brother and father's Hitachi TVs just fine. Charter didn't know how to set them up at first, but now its a snap.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[keith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2007 4:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</guid><description><![CDATA[I had problems with my VIsta Media Center but that was caused by buggy firmware in the ATI Digital Cable Tuner.  Can't fault Comcast for that.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Mallory]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2007 5:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would like to see documentation of CableLabs stifling approval of CableCard devices.  I believe CableLabs has approved every device that has met the requirements.  <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Mallory]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2007 5:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</guid><description><![CDATA[My Mitz 62 inch came with an internal tuner and DVR that ran on a cablecard...but I couldn't get support from Cox for it. When the "expert" came out to install it, he had less knowledge than Chuck's weakest link on the Nerd Herd. Finally, a support rep admitted that the cable provider would never truly support the card. The reason: the company makes significantly less on cablecard rentals than set-top monthly fees. <br><br>And THAT is why the cablecard is DOA.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[whawha]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2007 7:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</guid><description><![CDATA[Call Cox back.  It's the law, they have to support it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[keith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2007 12:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</guid><description><![CDATA[GUESS WHAT, I saw that picture and almost punched my monitor off my desk, In fact Ive had so many problems with that cable box, cable card, and those who sit at a desk wondering when they might find a problem that they actually have the knowledge to solve, I DROPPED MY CARRIER, yeah, in other words... CABLE CARDS ARE FAR FROM A SUCCESS]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael I]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2007 10:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</guid><description><![CDATA[Personally I think CableCARDs are NOT successful because only a niche group has them and their very unreliable as many say here. For them to be anywhere near successful, HDTV companies need to actually be fully supporting them and they need to work painlessly out of the box so any person buying a TV can install it and watch Digital Cable without hassle. But they just been a headache for most it seems.<br><br>Personally, I think what the FCC should be pushing more for is allowing more stations on Digital Cable to be Clear QAM than just the local broadcast stations and certain music stations (usually the only digital cable stations that are Clear QAM, the rest are Encrypted QAM). More and more HDTVs and HDTV tuners on PCs are supporting Clear QAM and personally, it would be nice if those of us who have Clear QAM compatible TVs/tuners could just watch the digital stations we subscribed for, painlessly without needing a tuner box or a CableCARD and they could just block out the stations we didn't subscribe for. But knowing these companies and their DRM and whatnot, I seriously doubt that would ever, ever happen anytime soon...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DA360]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 4th 2007 1:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</guid><description><![CDATA[the damn cable/media companies screwed this up from the beginning. we essentially have to use a cable card just to get the digital equivilant capability we had with analog cable ready tv's. they had to all have it their own way. theres no standard for the digital channel #'s. so finding the digital channels on cable without a cable card is a crap shoot. and now the tv makers don't want to put them in anymore. so were pretty much forced to use the boxes from the cable companies. just the way they wanted it. big cable has all the power and the consumer gets boned. if the FCC did their job instead of taking payoffs from big cable we wouldn't need a cable card. the channels would all come in correct as they would with a card. then adding a card would allow you to have a guide and on demand n such. thats the way it should be. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 5th 2007 1:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/02/are-cablecards-a-success/</guid><description><![CDATA[Would anyone be interested in becoming a class representative in a case against the cable companies over cablecards?  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2007 10:19AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>