For a person that cares about HD, I wouldn't think you'd write such a flippant comment on 24p. Also, many TVs are starting to accept that source and show at 72 or 120 hz. And I know some people don't see the judder, unless you point it out to them, and I hate that especially on the credits, and scrolling tickers sometimes that it is impossible to not notice. And sometimes nearly illegible.
Maybe I'm a purist, but I'd think most people seeing one way versus the other would deifintely prefer to choose the 24p when projected right.
I won't even get into the "artistic" aspects that some will discuss, because those are less pronounced to me and a high-speed scene on film can suffer from "motion-blur" so to speak, which is annoying and I'd prefer everything shot on digital and post-processed to use 48p, if you want a film like transfer, but with more frames for those fast scenes...
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Erick @ Oct 1st 2007 3:18PM
For a person that cares about HD, I wouldn't think you'd write such a flippant comment on 24p. Also, many TVs are starting to accept that source and show at 72 or 120 hz. And I know some people don't see the judder, unless you point it out to them, and I hate that especially on the credits, and scrolling tickers sometimes that it is impossible to not notice. And sometimes nearly illegible.
Maybe I'm a purist, but I'd think most people seeing one way versus the other would deifintely prefer to choose the 24p when projected right.
I won't even get into the "artistic" aspects that some will discuss, because those are less pronounced to me and a high-speed scene on film can suffer from "motion-blur" so to speak, which is annoying and I'd prefer everything shot on digital and post-processed to use 48p, if you want a film like transfer, but with more frames for those fast scenes...
/rant