<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Sony unveils Blu-ray equipped HTP-BD2RSF HTIB system</title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/08/31/sony-unveils-blu-ray-equipped-htp-bd2rsf-htib-system/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Sony unveils Blu-ray equipped HTP-BD2RSF HTIB system</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony unveils Blu-ray equipped HTP-BD2RSF HTIB system]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/08/31/sony-unveils-blu-ray-equipped-htp-bd2rsf-htib-system/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/08/31/sony-unveils-blu-ray-equipped-htp-bd2rsf-htib-system/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've been wondering when someone would drop something like this.<br><br>What I'd really like to see is one of Sony's 2.1 Systems with Blu-ray.  They're great options for flat-panel owners who don't want to run a lot of speaker wires and aren't too concerned about audio quality.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 1st 2007 8:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony unveils Blu-ray equipped HTP-BD2RSF HTIB system]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/08/31/sony-unveils-blu-ray-equipped-htp-bd2rsf-htib-system/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/08/31/sony-unveils-blu-ray-equipped-htp-bd2rsf-htib-system/</guid><description><![CDATA["HTIB systems have never been known for their sound quality and something tells us this 1000W system is going to be exactly top-notch"<br><br>I assume this sentence in missing the word 'not' between is and going.  Having someone else read (not 'look over' but truly read) a story really helps to spot non-typo errors like this.  And to those flamers who would rant "everyone knows what he meant" - well, that's fine for a personal web log posting, but we should all expect better from a professional news outlet.  And I do consider Engadget / EngadgetHD professional, so I know they can do better - just take a few moments to check and re-check the copy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TNP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 1st 2007 11:23AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>