Neither of the "Pirates" sequels holds up to the original, which was an amazing and pleasant surprise, but "At World's End" was even more confusing than "Dead Man's Chest" and harder to stay awake through. Blockbuster films don't necessarily convey quality or even a desire to own on any format. Case in point: the $200+ million Affleck/Willis spectacle known as "Armageddon;" both "Fantastic Four" movies; and "Ghost Rider," featuring Nicolas Cage and his computer-generated abs.
"Casino Royale," now THAT'S a movie worth owning. News flash: these are just my opinions; no need to start another format debate (again).
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Paul Fernandez @ Jul 26th 2007 2:33PM
Neither of the "Pirates" sequels holds up to the original, which was an amazing and pleasant surprise, but "At World's End" was even more confusing than "Dead Man's Chest" and harder to stay awake through. Blockbuster films don't necessarily convey quality or even a desire to own on any format. Case in point: the $200+ million Affleck/Willis spectacle known as "Armageddon;" both "Fantastic Four" movies; and "Ghost Rider," featuring Nicolas Cage and his computer-generated abs.
"Casino Royale," now THAT'S a movie worth owning. News flash: these are just my opinions; no need to start another format debate (again).
Richard Lawler @ Jul 26th 2007 2:34PM
Dude, it's ALWAYS time to start another format debate.