http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/ Engadget HD Comments for Analyst claims BD+ is impenetrable for ten years, hackers chuckle http://www.engadgethd.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadgethd.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/Jul 10th 2007 2:46PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/


And by the way.... if AACS has only been partially hacked, then what would be a full hack?]]>Jul 10th 2007 3:23PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/Jul 10th 2007 3:24PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/Jul 10th 2007 4:22PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/
Idiot.]]>Jul 10th 2007 5:33PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/
Sure the message is the same, but you really shouldn't quote something unless you are going to do it correctly.]]>Jul 10th 2007 5:57PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/Jul 10th 2007 6:30PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/Jul 11th 2007 1:49PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/07/10/analyst-claims-bd-is-impenetrable-for-ten-years-hackers-chuckl/
And just FYI, AACS itself WAS NOT HACKED.

The AACS "hack" was volume key sniffing. None of the encryption alogrithms themselves have been reverse engineered or defeated. The hack is that somebody(s) was smart enough to figure out where the keys were stored in RAM, and published them. AACS is still in place and working, but until they disallow playback on PCs, they keys will always be accessible to someone with enough time/brains.

-Pie]]>Jul 12th 2007 2:16PM