Honestly, a Harmony 880 is going to be better for most consumers unless they're already stocked to the brim with Denon products, and to be honest... it's kind of 90's looking...
Still not bad, but anyone with enough Denon components to make the thing useful out of the both probably already picked up an 890, 1000 or one of the big Universal brand universals.
Multi-zone might be cool though, Harmony's don't deal well with multi-zone... (At least they don't with anything but Yamaha)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Britboyj27 @ Jun 30th 2007 1:31PM
Honestly, a Harmony 880 is going to be better for most consumers unless they're already stocked to the brim with Denon products, and to be honest... it's kind of 90's looking...
Still not bad, but anyone with enough Denon components to make the thing useful out of the both probably already picked up an 890, 1000 or one of the big Universal brand universals.
Multi-zone might be cool though, Harmony's don't deal well with multi-zone... (At least they don't with anything but Yamaha)
Kevin Murphy @ Jun 30th 2007 2:51PM
Better yet, the FCC would just order the AV manufacturers to, um, harmonize their remote codes so that universal remotes could actually be universal.