I am still frustrated by the fact that plasma resolution has not caught up to LCD. The plasmas that are 1080p are often more expensive than getting a compariably priced LCD now. Before anyone gives me a hate mail reply, I will preface it by saying that I really prefer 1080p resolution as I use it with an HTPC.
If there was a viable 1080p plasma in each size category when they were launched (or soon after) then no one would need to investigate other alternatives such as LCDs.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Aaron @ Apr 11th 2007 1:47PM
I am still frustrated by the fact that plasma resolution has not caught up to LCD. The plasmas that are 1080p are often more expensive than getting a compariably priced LCD now. Before anyone gives me a hate mail reply, I will preface it by saying that I really prefer 1080p resolution as I use it with an HTPC.
If there was a viable 1080p plasma in each size category when they were launched (or soon after) then no one would need to investigate other alternatives such as LCDs.
I read the recent Panasonic release about their 42" 1080P plasma:
http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/10/panasonics-worlds-smallest-42-inch-1080p-plasma-now-in-produ/
However, this will not be available for probably several months in the US and, in my mind, is about 1 year too late.