"Sure every technology has it downsides, but when we are talking about picture quality above all else, which is the best? In the past people would debate LCD vs Plasma..."
Actually, anyone who knew what they were talking about would have said CRT, if talking picture quality above all else. Both LCD and Plasma are getting closer, but you'll still hear the best of the best talked about as having "near CRT quality."
Of course, screen size is the limiting factor with CRT, that's why the "above all else" qualifier must come into play.
Here's hoping SED gets out of lawsuit purgatory. It promises the best of both worlds: virtually unlimited screen sizes, ultra thin displays, and CRT-inspired technology for the PQ.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Tony @ Feb 26th 2007 5:35PM
"Sure every technology has it downsides, but when we are talking about picture quality above all else, which is the best? In the past people would debate LCD vs Plasma..."
Actually, anyone who knew what they were talking about would have said CRT, if talking picture quality above all else. Both LCD and Plasma are getting closer, but you'll still hear the best of the best talked about as having "near CRT quality."
Of course, screen size is the limiting factor with CRT, that's why the "above all else" qualifier must come into play.
Here's hoping SED gets out of lawsuit purgatory. It promises the best of both worlds: virtually unlimited screen sizes, ultra thin displays, and CRT-inspired technology for the PQ.
Ben @ Feb 26th 2007 5:57PM
Good point, I should have mentioned a size as a qualifier.