<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Judge favors Nano-Proprietary in Canon licensing quandary</title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/02/23/judge-favors-nano-proprietary-in-canon-licensing-quandary/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Judge favors Nano-Proprietary in Canon licensing quandary</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Judge favors Nano-Proprietary in Canon licensing quandary]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/02/23/judge-favors-nano-proprietary-in-canon-licensing-quandary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/02/23/judge-favors-nano-proprietary-in-canon-licensing-quandary/</guid><description><![CDATA[That really blows. I was looking forward to this great new tech.  I hope cooler heads can hammer out a new agreement so that we, the consumers, can can gain this level of TV. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Citrixguy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2007 10:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Judge favors Nano-Proprietary in Canon licensing quandary]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/02/23/judge-favors-nano-proprietary-in-canon-licensing-quandary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/02/23/judge-favors-nano-proprietary-in-canon-licensing-quandary/</guid><description><![CDATA[If the technology is worth something, ie, it works at a reasonable price, we'll see it.  Everybody in the deal wants to make money and will figure out how to do it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2007 2:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Judge favors Nano-Proprietary in Canon licensing quandary]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/02/23/judge-favors-nano-proprietary-in-canon-licensing-quandary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/02/23/judge-favors-nano-proprietary-in-canon-licensing-quandary/</guid><description><![CDATA[By the time SED hits the market, Plasma will look so good and be so affordable, noone will care anymore.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Loban]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2007 4:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Judge favors Nano-Proprietary in Canon licensing quandary]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/02/23/judge-favors-nano-proprietary-in-canon-licensing-quandary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/02/23/judge-favors-nano-proprietary-in-canon-licensing-quandary/</guid><description><![CDATA[Loban...i somewhat agree with you. Kinda dumb on their part...woulda been a great competitor for plasma/lcd. from what i remember, only reason they it really hasn't come to market sooner was the price, but now that legal woes are being thrown into the mix...<br><br>well, lets just say plasmas are getting cheaper and cheaper every year, consuming less power, not burning in as easily as older generation models....and then you have lcds which are getting better and better at larger sized tvs, doing real blacks instead of dark grays, and getting cheaper too. by the time they get something out, it may be too late]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SimbaDogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2007 12:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Judge favors Nano-Proprietary in Canon licensing quandary]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/02/23/judge-favors-nano-proprietary-in-canon-licensing-quandary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/02/23/judge-favors-nano-proprietary-in-canon-licensing-quandary/</guid><description><![CDATA[And what about a SED display with real black and a 100.000:1 contrast ratio in 55" at the same prize of a last generation 42" plasma?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jordi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2007 9:08PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>