<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</guid><description><![CDATA[sluggish? it's ~4.3MB/s or about 4x in DVD-9 speeds. Sounds good to me for a first gen drive]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[b.land]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2007 9:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</guid><description><![CDATA[A 15GB cpacity?  This is what I feared from HD-DVD-R.<br><br>It's a tiny step up, as two DVD-9s match that capacity and (likely) beat the hell out of it in price.<br><br>The format war sucks, but 15GB compared to that hand-to-the-face 25GB or 50GB BD-R is... wait... who's hand was in whose face?<br><br>-Pie]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EatingPie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2007 11:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</guid><description><![CDATA[The real hand to the face is the price. There is no reason HD DVD media and hardware won't eventually drop to the current DVD prices. Plus you will eventually get a DL 30GB disc. While Blu-ray will never be able to be able to approach that cost due to license fees and production cost. (thank you Sony and it's supporters!!) 50GB would be great for backups and such, but I don't think it will ever justify the price premium. (as everyone has been able to see, Blu-ray's more advanced technology doesn't translate to better looking movies)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2007 12:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</guid><description><![CDATA["but I don't think it will ever justify the price premium"<br><br>LOL<br><br>Blu-ray is cheaper per GB than hd dvd... and have more future proof variants in the face of BD 100 and BD 200...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2007 1:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Keep dreaming my friend. You are comparing retail prices at this early stage, which they are close. So, yes at this moment the price per GB is less. The production costs are not even close. HD DVD is the clear winner, and as soon as Toshiba and it's backers are ready it won't even compare.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2007 1:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Robert, definitely have to call you into question on this.<br><br>How do you know 25GB or 50GB blu-ray will always be expensive?  HD-DVD has licensing fees as well... that's the WHOLE POINT of the format war.  So your claim doesn't hold water.<br><br>And indeed 50GB WILL be good for backup.  As it stands 15GB is a huge disappointment, even when up against 25GB (and you can get both 25 and 50GB burners right now).  About half my collection of HDTV caps are larger than 15GB and will never fit on an HD-DVD.  And even my iPhoto library alone beats 15GB.  Plain and simple, it's weak sauce.  The DVD group should have done better.<br><br>And to call a "clear winner" right now is the utmost in foolishness.  Indeed, HD-DVD MAY win the format war, but you don't even realize this is the first CES show with HD-DVD as an actual launched product.  Same for Blu-Ray.  Both were launched after last year's CES.  We are still in "wait and see" mode... and that's the only thing that's clear about the format war right now.<br><br>-Pie]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EatingPie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2007 1:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</guid><description><![CDATA[My claim was more to the clear winner in price, not the format war. Sony's license fees are far more than Toshiba, just look at the players. Which is where my licesnse fee comment was directed. Should have been more specific. HD DVDs can be made on existing DVD production lines with minimal modifications. Blu-ray requires mostly new equipment and will take years of inflated prices before they reduce the price because they "recouped" the cost. I should have been specific earlier, I was making a general comment that covered a couple different areas. It's simple economics, Blu-ray is and will be more expensive for the forseeable future. I would be all for keeping blu-ray around as a high-end storage media for PCs, but keep it out of my living room. Is HD DVD the answer, probably not, but is more friendly to the consumer, especially in the pocketbook.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2007 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</guid><description><![CDATA["Sony's license fees are far more than Toshiba, just look at the players."<br><br>Yeah, i bet you know that!<br><br>So far Blu-ray is cheaper per GB. At the time when hd dvd prices get down Blu-ray will have been used @ its low prices for years... After that ... who knows.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2007 2:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't known the specific price. But, anyone who has been reading statements and interviews/articles from and about the various manufactures would know that is correct. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2007 2:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm going to be a little harsh here...<br><br>Once again, you're talking pure speculation, and very poor speculation at that.<br><br>In terms of price, one of the best Blu-Ray players is just $100 more than the cheapest HD-DVD player.  And said $100 gets you to 1080p, which said HD-DVD player does not do -- you need to jump to the $1K price range for that.  And pre-recorded software, Blu-Ray and HD-DVD are comparable in price.<br><br>You cite "years of inflated prices" when already prices are comprable.  I see nothing to support your claims.<br><br>And more to the topic, the 1X 15GB HD-DVD burner is laughable.  I've made this clear before, but compare it to the new 4x 25GB/50GB BD burner (and "old" 2x burners), or to the price/capacity/speed of a 4x DL-DVD-R, and this is a joke on the consumers who buy it.  A frickin' joke of mammoth proportions!<br><br>What I care about here is the truth -- not Blu-Ray or HD-DVD zealotry.  You're talking speculation of the worse kind, and your claiming a winner in the format war based on this.  That's what I have a problem with, and why I'm responding here.<br><br>-Pie]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EatingPie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2007 3:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Price will be driven by volume, not by current technological limitations. I think it was extremely short sighted of Toshiba to develop a format which tops out at 30Gb just to easy the upgrade path. It seems they focused only on requirements for hi-def video at that time and forgot about growing storage needs. Even for hi-def video it is short-sighted because they topped the bitrate  at 36Mbs for the video format. Back to the price, Sony and NEC have a joint venture to produce the drives so I believe that both camps will have comparable prices.  However it seems sony will use its majority stake to push their format... <a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20061116PR208.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20061116PR208.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Edu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2007 9:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</guid><description><![CDATA[I still believe Laserdisc is the clear winner.  You should see how cheap the movies are on Ebay!  Waaaay cheaper than DVD's!  Just kidding!!  HD-DVD RULEZ!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[digitalbt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2007 12:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Lets list some 'better' technologies<br>BETAmax vs VHS - sony loses<br>MMCD vs SD (aka DVD) - sony loses<br>MiniDisc vs Cd/tape - Sony loses<br>ATRAC vs MP3 - sony loses<br>SDDS vs Dolby Digital... sony loses<br>S/PDIF vs DVD audio....draw<br>UMD vs DVD?...sony loses<br>Blu-ray vs HD-DVD... I guess time will tell...<br>and I personally hope blu-ray is as fantastic a failure as every other proprietary, non-compatible format they've ever thought up.  If any other company was to have failed this many times.. <br>and shove those Memory Sticks (DUO or otherwise)you-know-where too<br>Can you tell I hate Sony?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[poos4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 20th 2007 5:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, I am working on my own specification called HD1080ip™ (Trademark Applied for with the USPTO).  This specification will deliver HD over ip (internet protocol) at 1920x1080 and bypass the disc wars all together.  Instead of discs the stream will be recorded to hard disk. Instead of a 400-900.00 HD-DVD or Blu-Ray player you are better off with a Hard Disk media server (more like Tivo® or something) that stores your content for diplay on your 1080p HDTV.  The material will be fully interactive just like a web-page. I will be recording a demonstration in HD soon for transcoding to my HD1080ip™ specification for internet delivery experiement. The video will include a chat function to the side so you can watch the entertainment and chat with the main character (which in this case will be myself).  This will be like a director's chat on DVD, the actual video will be pre-recorded, edited and have graphics.  It may come in 3 different quality choices (yes even HD can range in quality).  The 3 quality formats I am considering is Theater (specifically designed for distribution to a digital theater over fiber optics which is film quality), Archive (specially designed for distribution to a person's video collection which would be equivalent to HD-DVD or Blu-Ray), and Stream which is designed for internet streaming (non-archived) for sitcom, education, sports programming and chat but all with the same pixel ratio.  I may change the pixel ratio of Theater broadcasts over fiber, but that is in a different development pipeline than the other two since 1080 has been settled on as a standard (whether it be 1080p 1080i or in my case HD1080ip™).   The world should take note, that I am not going to fight Apple® over my specifications. HD1080ip™ is a trademark of Randy Stewart Miller and I am not going to tollerate any trademark or copyright thefts...( <a href="http://www.stewartmilleronline.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.stewartmilleronline.com</a> ).  In fact, my vision is quite clearly different than that of YouTube® or Yahoo® or others that just try to make money off of other people's work without building real infrastructure.  My ideas involve both infrastructure as well as media.  Had a venture capital company litened to me over a decade ago, we would be a lot better off on the infrastructure side of the house today, but instead they opted to finance more copper crap from local telephone companies.  We will see what happens next.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2007 7:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/05/toshiba-unveils-sd-h903a-hd-dvd-burner-for-pcs/</guid><description><![CDATA[And for what it is worth... I do love Sony®.  I really like Sony®, but as far as the disc wars go, I think HD-DVD is ahead due to Toshiba® really being aggressive on price and quality.  I use the Sony hi-MD for recording, but they developed that and then abanonded it as a consumer item.  So yes Mp3 did win.  But is Mp3 better than ATRAC?  I think not but the consumer devices that sprung up supported Mp3 since it was the format of illegal music distribution.  We can thank illegal music distribution for the mp3 player.  Not to say that mp3 is all bad, it makes for an adequate end product in audio encoding.  Sony® makes excellent products, but they often go at it alone and eventually have to give it up for the mainstream anyway.  Now where did I lay my Sony Mp3 player?  Just kidding.  I still use the hi-MD.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2007 7:34AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>