"It didn't feature "the best picture quality," but admitted that it was a bargain and "a good value" nonetheless."
If this were Digg, I'd probably get dugg down for saying this. I don't really see a difference between 1080i and 1080p really at all. So, with that as my preference, and I would venture to say there are a few people that agree with me- I'd go for an hd set with a really nice picture in 720p/1080i for a decent price (around $1,200) than pay $1,900 (let's face it, if it's below $2k then that's what they mean) for a well priced set with an okay picture. I don't know, maybe it's just me...
I just bought a Sony KDF-50E2000 50-inch Rear Projection HDTV for $1,087 from Overstock.com and it has an amazing picture, a crap load of inputs and was wicked cheap- and I couldn't be happier with my decision. But I guess it's all relative.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Ben @ Dec 16th 2006 11:16PM
"It didn't feature "the best picture quality," but admitted that it was a bargain and "a good value" nonetheless."
If this were Digg, I'd probably get dugg down for saying this. I don't really see a difference between 1080i and 1080p really at all. So, with that as my preference, and I would venture to say there are a few people that agree with me- I'd go for an hd set with a really nice picture in 720p/1080i for a decent price (around $1,200) than pay $1,900 (let's face it, if it's below $2k then that's what they mean) for a well priced set with an okay picture. I don't know, maybe it's just me...
I just bought a Sony KDF-50E2000 50-inch Rear Projection HDTV for $1,087 from Overstock.com and it has an amazing picture, a crap load of inputs and was wicked cheap- and I couldn't be happier with my decision. But I guess it's all relative.
j @ Jan 7th 2007 3:06AM
shut ur mouth vizio beats out your big projection tv by millions of miles... see ya ... balllllliiiiinnnnnnn