<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/16/time-warner-gets-fussy-with-directv-over-nfl-network-coverage/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/16/time-warner-gets-fussy-with-directv-over-nfl-network-coverage/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/16/time-warner-gets-fussy-with-directv-over-nfl-network-coverage/</guid><description><![CDATA[Jessica Simpson can't even spell 1080i, and admits she doesn't even know what it means. In fact, I think directv caters to dumb people like her so they will not be aware they are not getting the full resolution of 1080i in the first place. Dumb needs dumb.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GhostDoggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 16th 2006 10:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/16/time-warner-gets-fussy-with-directv-over-nfl-network-coverage/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/16/time-warner-gets-fussy-with-directv-over-nfl-network-coverage/</guid><description><![CDATA[I had Direct TV....The picture was fine, The problem was whenever it rained I would lose the picture every single time. So I finally got COX cable,The picture is the same for the most part,Plus I like the On-Demand better,plus it  the place is more local,as in my town. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt T.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2006 5:59PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>