Skip to Content
That should read loss of the 5.1 analog outputs.The units have optical, (but not coaxial) digital outputs.The lack of the analog outputs are what prompted me to get the A-1 (which has really been wart-free) instead of waiting for the A-2.-bruce
That actually makes sense, Im guessing its a cost cutting measure.Why not just route the sound (digital output) to your receiver... 5.1 decoding is pretty much a standard thing on home theater receivers these days.
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
BruceOrlando @ Dec 12th 2006 4:44PM
That should read loss of the 5.1 analog outputs.
The units have optical, (but not coaxial) digital outputs.
The lack of the analog outputs are what prompted me to get the A-1 (which has really been wart-free) instead of waiting for the A-2.
-bruce
pliepl @ Dec 12th 2006 4:53PM
That actually makes sense, Im guessing its a cost cutting measure.
Why not just route the sound (digital output) to your receiver... 5.1 decoding is pretty much a standard thing on home theater receivers these days.