Wait, there's an ESPN2 HD? A 2?? Their "1" isn't even in HD 90% of the time!
About a year ago, TWC used to be a great and inexpensive alternative to Satellite. Now the sats provide many, many more channels, and no matter how much I bug them they refuse to add any new channels. Now they add.... crap?
I agree. In Rochester NY, for years and years TW was ahead of the game, often using Rochester as a test bed before rolling out new interactive technologies, digital cable, etc. to the rest of the world. Now they seem to be lagging behind. I letter sent to them asking about this... -- especially the unbelievably low number of HD on Demand choices (where some other cable providers have entire libraries on demand) got me a "sorry, and we don't have any firm plans for expansion" response.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
EatingPie @ Dec 12th 2006 6:08AM
Wait, there's an ESPN2 HD? A 2?? Their "1" isn't even in HD 90% of the time!
About a year ago, TWC used to be a great and inexpensive alternative to Satellite. Now the sats provide many, many more channels, and no matter how much I bug them they refuse to add any new channels. Now they add.... crap?
-Pie
Roc1051 @ Dec 12th 2006 9:41AM
I agree. In Rochester NY, for years and years TW was ahead of the game, often using Rochester as a test bed before rolling out new interactive technologies, digital cable, etc. to the rest of the world. Now they seem to be lagging behind. I letter sent to them asking about this... -- especially the unbelievably low number of HD on Demand choices (where some other cable providers have entire libraries on demand) got me a "sorry, and we don't have any firm plans for expansion" response.